ArticleDer Orthopade2008
[Determining the indication for primary total hip and knee replacement. Results of external quality assurance of over 270,000 primary total hip and knee replacements].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Course of pain after total hip arthroplasty within a standardized pain management concept: a prospective study examining influence, correlation, and outcome of postoperative pain on 103 consecutive patients.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2018Trial
- [Course of pain after operative orthopedic interventions: Characterization exemplified by total knee arthroplasty].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2016Trial
- Implementing fast-track in total hip arthroplasty: rapid mobilization with low need for pain medication and low pain values : Retrospective analysis of 102 consecutive patients.Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Enhanced Recovery After Total Hip Replacement Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2022Article
- [Minimal provider volume in total knee replacement : an analysis of the external quality assurance program of North Rhine-Westphalia (QS-NRW)].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe German mandatory quality assurance programme collects data from all primary total hip and knee replacements. The quality of the indication is measured by clinical and radiological criteria. The results were analysed in terms of differences in establishing the indication subject to patient and hospital characteristics. MATERIALS AND
methodsData on more than 270,000 primary total hip and knee replacements that were operated in 2006 in Germany were analysed concerning differences in the quality of the indication subject to age, gender, hospital volume and density of population and hospitals (metropolitan vs rural areas). The statistical analysis was done by exact Fisher's test.
resultsThe quality of the indication was statistically significantly better in men, patients 60 and older, in rural areas and in high volume hospitals (50 and more joint replacements per year). DISCUSSION: Data of this mandatory German quality assurance programme are useful to describe differences in medical care. The results are valid and complete. An exact analysis of the reasons for these differences is difficult though. Data focus is on quality assurance and represent only in-hospital results.
conclusionFurther analyses are necessary to ascertain whether the differences in quality of care are deficits or only variances in medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18806998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.