Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18806985›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2008

[Choice of early and escalation treatment options for multiple sclerosis].

R A Linker, B C Kieseier

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R A LinkerAbteilung Neurologie, St.-Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Deutschland.
B C Kieseier
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in understanding of the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) have led to the development of new treatment options. To date several immunomodulatory agents have been licensed for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. However, some debate remains on the optimal time point for initiating therapy. While there is general consensus on the benefit of an early treatment start, the issues of how to define "early MS" and how to identify patients with a "benign" disease course have not yet been finally addressed. Further open questions include the situations of treatment failure and therapeutic escalation. Here we summarize available data from studies on early treatment with immunomodulatory drugs for a first demyelinating event, also referred to as clinically isolated syndrome. Furthermore, options for the escalation of immunomodulatory therapy will be discussed, e.g. with the recently licensed monoclonal antibody natalizumab.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsBrainHumansImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1bMagnetic Resonance ImagingMitoxantroneMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNatalizumabRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRituximabAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1bMitoxantroneNatalizumabRituximab

Identifiers

PMID18806985
OpenAlexW1571291825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.