Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18806255›Full record

ReviewEpidemiologic reviews2008

The burden of mental disorders.

William W Eaton, Silvia S Martins, Gerald Nestadt, O Joseph Bienvenu, Diana Clarke, Pierre Alexandre

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Epidemiologic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Anxiety disorders and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William W EatonDepartment of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. weaton@jhsph.edu
Silvia S Martins
Gerald Nestadt
O Joseph Bienvenu
Diana Clarke
Pierre Alexandre

Funding

EVOLUTION OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY IN THE POPULATIONR01MH047447 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EATON, WILLIAM W · 1992 to 2006
$5.3M
Economic Aspects of Ecstacy UseR01DA020630 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXANDRE, PIERRE K · 2007 to 2009
$922k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020630NIMH NIH HHS MH 47447NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH047447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, there has been an increase in interest in the burden of chronic and disabling health conditions that are not necessarily fatal, such as the mental disorders. This review systematically summarizes data on the burden associated with 11 major mental disorders of adults. The measures of burden include estimates of prevalence, mortality associated with the disorders, disabilities and impairments related to the disorders, and costs. This review expands the range of mental disorders considered in a report on the global burden of disease, updates the literature, presents information on the range and depth of sources of information on burden, and adds estimates of costs. The purpose is to provide an accessible guide to the burden of mental disorders, especially for researchers and policy makers who may not be familiar with this subfield of epidemiology.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHumansMental DisordersPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID18806255
PMCPMC2683377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.