Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18804891›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2008

Changing partners: moving from non-homologous to homologous centromere pairing in meiosis.

Mara N Stewart, Dean S Dawson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heterochromatin in plant meiosis.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Cytological analysis of the diploid-like inheritance of newly synthesized allotetraploid wheat.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recombination-independent recognition of DNA homology for meiotic silencing inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mara N StewartMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, 347 UCB, Colorado Avenue, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347, USA.
Dean S Dawson

Funding

Segregation of error-prone chromosomes in meiosisR01GM075363 · NIGMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI DAWSON, DEAN S · 2006 to 2010
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reports of centromere pairing in early meiotic cells have appeared sporadically over the past thirty years. Recent experiments demonstrate that early centromere pairing occurs between non-homologous centromeres. As meiosis proceeds, centromeres change partners, becoming arranged in homologous pairs. Investigations of these later centromere pairs indicate that paired homologous centromeres are actively associated rather than positioned passively, side-by-side. Meiotic centromere pairing has been observed in organisms as diverse as mice, wheat and yeast, indicating that non-homologous centromere pairing in early meiosis and active homologous centromere pairing in later meiosis might be themes in meiotic chromosome behavior. Moreover, such pairing could have previously unrecognized roles in mediating chromosome organization or architecture that impact meiotic segregation fidelity.

Indexed as

MeiosisAnimalsCentromereChromosome PairingChromosome SegregationHumansModels, GeneticRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID18804891
PMCPMC2861281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.