Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18803850›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2008

Menopausal hormone therapy in relation to breast cancer characteristics and prognosis: a cohort study.

Lena U Rosenberg, Fredrik Granath, Paul W Dickman, Kristjana Einarsdóttir, Sara Wedrén, Ingemar Persson, Per Hall

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival by Tumor Subtype: Pooled Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Mammographic density reduction is a prognostic marker of response to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Changing concepts: Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lena U RosenbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. lena.u.rosenberg@ki.se
Fredrik Granath
Paul W Dickman
Kristjana Einarsdóttir
Sara Wedrén
Ingemar Persson
Per Hall
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMenopausal hormone therapy has been reported to increase the risk of certain subtypes of breast cancer and to be associated with a favorable survival. These associations could either be due to an increased mammographic surveillance or to a biological effect. We assessed these associations in a Swedish cohort of postmenopausal breast cancer patients holding information on mammographic examinations, menopausal hormone therapy use, other breast cancer risk factors, and cancer treatment.

methodsWe analyzed 2,660 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 74 years, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 1993 to 1995 and followed until the end of 2003 (median follow-up, 9 years and 3 months). We assessed the influence of hormone therapy before diagnosis on tumor characteristics and breast cancer-specific survival. We analyzed hormone therapy before diagnosis by regimen (estrogen-progestin therapy or estrogen alone therapy), recency (current or past), and duration of use (<5 years or > or = 5 years).

resultsCurrent use, but not past use, compared with never use of hormone therapy before diagnosis seemed to be associated with tumors of low grade and with improved breast cancer-specific survival. The associations were stronger with longer duration, but did not vary significantly by regimen. The favorable survival among current users of hormone therapy was only partly explained by differences in available tumor characteristics and mammographic surveillance.

conclusionsWe conclude that current menopausal hormone therapy, especially long term, is associated with favorable tumor characteristics and survival.

Indexed as

MenopauseAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCohort StudiesEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHormone Replacement TherapyHumansLymphatic MetastasisMammographyMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID18803850
PMCPMC2614511
OpenAlexW2049931583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.