Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18803835›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2008

Phylogenetic and chromosomal analyses of multiple gene families syntenic with vertebrate Hox clusters.

Görel Sundström, Tomas A Larsson, Dan Larhammar

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Clustering of mammalian Hox genes with other H3K27me3 targets within an active nuclear domain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 2R or not 2R is not the question anymore.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2010
    Article
  19. Identification of the zebrafish ventral habenula as a homolog of the mammalian lateral habenula.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  20. Evolution of developmental regulation in the vertebrate FgfD subfamily.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Görel SundströmDepartment of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Box 593, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Gorel.Sundstrom@neuro.uu.se
Tomas A Larsson
Dan Larhammar
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEver since the theory about two rounds of genome duplication (2R) in the vertebrate lineage was proposed, the Hox gene clusters have served as the prime example of quadruplicate paralogy in mammalian genomes. In teleost fishes, the observation of additional Hox clusters absent in other vertebrate lineages suggested a third tetraploidization (3R). Because the Hox clusters occupy a quite limited part of each chromosome, and are special in having position-dependent regulation within the multi-gene cluster, studies of syntenic gene families are needed to determine the extent of the duplicated chromosome segments. We have analyzed in detail 14 gene families that are syntenic with the Hox clusters to see if their phylogenies are compatible with the Hox duplications and the 2R/3R scenario. Our starting point was the gene family for the NPY family of peptides located near the Hox clusters in the pufferfish Takifugu rubripes, the zebrafish Danio rerio, and human.

resultsSeven of the gene families have members on at least three of the human Hox chromosomes and two families are present on all four. Using both neighbor-joining and quartet-puzzling maximum likelihood methods we found that 13 families have a phylogeny that supports duplications coinciding with the Hox cluster duplications. One additional family also has a topology consistent with 2R but due to lack of urochordate or cephalochordate sequences the time window when these duplications could have occurred is wider. All but two gene families also show teleost-specific duplicates.

conclusionBased on this analysis we conclude that the Hox cluster duplications involved a large number of adjacent gene families, supporting expansion of these families in the 2R, as well as in the teleost 3R tetraploidization. The gene duplicates presumably provided raw material in early vertebrate evolution for neofunctionalization and subfunctionalization.

Indexed as

Genes, HomeoboxMultigene FamilyPhylogenyAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsChromosome MappingConserved SequenceDatabases, ProteinEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationHumansNeuropeptide YSequence AlignmentTakifuguZebrafishNeuropeptide Y

Identifiers

PMID18803835
PMCPMC2566581
OpenAlexW2082393218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.