ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2008
Altered olfactory epithelial structure and function in feline models of mucopolysaccharidoses I and VI.
Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI, an Updated Overview of the Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Cognitive Abilities of Dogs with Mucopolysaccharidosis I: Learning and Memory.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Select noxious stimuli induce changes on corneal nerve morphology.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2017Article
- Comparative Morphology and Histology of the Nasal Fossa in Four Mammals: Gray Squirrel, Bobcat, Coyote, and White-Tailed Deer.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2016Article
- The influence of nasal airflow on respiratory and olfactory epithelial distribution in felids.The Journal of experimental biology · 2016Article
- Sensory-motor behavioral characterization of an animal model of Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome (or Mucopolysaccharidosis VI).Scientific reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a family of lysosomal storage diseases resulting in developmental defects and, in some types, mental retardation and other neurological symptoms. To gain insight into the neurological dysfunction in MPS, we examined the morphology of olfactory epithelia (OE) and physiology of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) in cat models of MPS I, a type in which neuronal lesions are prominent, and MPS VI, in which they are essentially absent. Histopathology showed that both groups of MPS-affected cats had significantly thinner OE than controls. Although immature and mature ORNs were present in both MPS I and VI affected OE, the OE of MPS I-affected cats was structurally disorganized. ORN function was assessed with calcium imaging and patch-clamp recording. Few viable ORNs were recovered from MPS VI cats, but these exhibited normal responses to odors and pharmacological stimuli. In contrast, viable ORNs were as prevalent in MPS I as in controls but were significantly less likely to respond to odor stimuli, although other responses were normal. Disrupted OE organization and impaired ORN function in MPS I, but not MPS VI, corresponds to the central nervous system lesions found in MPS I but not MPS VI. These data represent the first neurophysiological correlate of this correspondence and have implications both for understanding the role of glycosaminoglycans in maintenance of the OE and for targeting further research into the basis for and treatment of the neurological consequences of MPS disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.