Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18802721›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2008

KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program.

J H J M van Krieken, A Jung, T Kirchner, F Carneiro, R Seruca, F T Bosman, P Quirke, J F Fléjou, T Plato Hansen, G de Hertogh and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 123 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 290 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. KRAS mutation in stage III colon cancer and clinical outcome following intergroup trial CALGB 89803.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2009
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The ideal reporting ofPathologica · 2023
    Review
  11. TheCancers · 2023
    Article
  12. Middle East and North Africa Registry to Characterize Rate of RAS Testing Status in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 13 countries.

J H J M van KriekenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, The Netherlands. J.vanKrieken@pathol.umcn.nl
A Jung
T Kirchner
F Carneiro
R Seruca
F T Bosman
P Quirke
J F Fléjou
T Plato Hansen
G de Hertogh
P Jares
C Langner
G Hoefler
M Ligtenberg
D Tiniakos
S Tejpar
G Bevilacqua
A Ensari
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedical University of Graz · ATRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversidade do Porto · PTAnkara University · TRHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESKU Leuven · BENational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GROdense University Hospital · DKSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel therapeutic agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have improved outcomes for patients with colorectal carcinoma. However, these therapies are effective only in a subset of patients. Activating mutations in the KRAS gene are found in 30-40% of colorectal tumors and are associated with poor response to anti-EGFR therapies. Thus, KRAS mutation status can predict which patient may or may not benefit from anti-EGFR therapy. Although many diagnostic tools have been developed for KRAS mutation analysis, validated methods and standardized testing procedures are lacking. This poses a challenge for the optimal use of anti-EGFR therapies in the management of colorectal carcinoma. Here we review the molecular basis of EGFR-targeted therapies and the resistance to treatment conferred by KRAS mutations. We also present guideline recommendations and a proposal for a European quality assurance program to help ensure accuracy and proficiency in KRAS mutation testing across the European Union.

Indexed as

AntibodiesColorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsEuropeGenetic TestingHumansPoint MutationPredictive Value of TestsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Quality Assurance, Health Careras ProteinsAntibodiesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18802721
OpenAlexW2145927385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.