ArticlePLoS genetics2008
Screening and replication using the same data set: testing strategies for family-based studies in which all probands are affected.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Genomics in the Era of Precision Medicine: Applications to Variant Analysis and Gene Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- A powerful nonparametric statistical framework for family-based association analyses.Genetics · 2015Article
- Two-stage family-based designs for sequencing studies.BMC proceedings · 2014Article
- Family-based association test using both common and rare variants and accounting for directions of effects for sequencing data.PloS one · 2014Article
- Two-phase and family-based designs for next-generation sequencing studies.Frontiers in genetics · 2013Review
- Association analysis of complex diseases using triads, parent-child dyads and singleton monads.BMC genetics · 2013Article
- Incorporating parental information into family-based association tests.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Attitudes toward Genetic Testing for Hypertension among African American Women and Girls.Nursing research and practice · 2013Article
- Rare variant analysis for family-based design.PloS one · 2013Article
- Testing for direct genetic effects using a screening step in family-based association studies.Frontiers in genetics · 2013Article
- A general framework for two-stage analysis of genome-wide association studies and its application to case-control studies.American journal of human genetics · 2012Article
- On the genome-wide analysis of copy number variants in family-based designs: methods for combining family-based and population-based information for testing dichotomous or quantitative traits, or completely ascertained samples.Genetic epidemiology · 2010Article
- Asthma-susceptibility variants identified using probands in case-control and family-based analyses.BMC medical genetics · 2010Article
- An omnibus test for family-based association studies with multiple SNPs and multiple phenotypes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2010Article
- On genome-wide association studies for family-based designs: an integrative analysis approach combining ascertained family samples with unselected controls.American journal of human genetics · 2010Article
- Association of polymorphisms in the SLIT2 axonal guidance gene with anger in suicide attempters.Molecular psychiatry · 2010Article
- Genetics of food allergy.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2009Review
- On the analysis of genome-wide association studies in family-based designs: a universal, robust analysis approach and an application to four genome-wide association studies.PLoS genetics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For genome-wide association studies in family-based designs, we propose a powerful two-stage testing strategy that can be applied in situations in which parent-offspring trio data are available and all offspring are affected with the trait or disease under study. In the first step of the testing strategy, we construct estimators of genetic effect size in the completely ascertained sample of affected offspring and their parents that are statistically independent of the family-based association/transmission disequilibrium tests (FBATs/TDTs) that are calculated in the second step of the testing strategy. For each marker, the genetic effect is estimated (without requiring an estimate of the SNP allele frequency) and the conditional power of the corresponding FBAT/TDT is computed. Based on the power estimates, a weighted Bonferroni procedure assigns an individually adjusted significance level to each SNP. In the second stage, the SNPs are tested with the FBAT/TDT statistic at the individually adjusted significance levels. Using simulation studies for scenarios with up to 1,000,000 SNPs, varying allele frequencies and genetic effect sizes, the power of the strategy is compared with standard methodology (e.g., FBATs/TDTs with Bonferroni correction). In all considered situations, the proposed testing strategy demonstrates substantial power increases over the standard approach, even when the true genetic model is unknown and must be selected based on the conditional power estimates. The practical relevance of our methodology is illustrated by an application to a genome-wide association study for childhood asthma, in which we detect two markers meeting genome-wide significance that would not have been detected using standard methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.