Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18802161›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2008

Randomized controlled trial of collaborative care management of depression among low-income patients with cancer.

Kathleen Ell, Bin Xie, Brenda Quon, David I Quinn, Megan Dwight-Johnson, Pey-Jiuan Lee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01781013 (Care Management Technology to Facilitate Depression Care in Safety Net Diabetes Clinics), which is not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 21 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01781013 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Care Management Technology to Facilitate Depression Care in Safety Net Diabetes Clinics

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2010 to 2013Enrolled1,485ConditionsDepression, Diabetes MellitusArmsTechnology-supported care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathleen EllSchool of Social Work and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0411, USA. ell@usc.edu
Bin Xie
Brenda Quon
David I Quinn
Megan Dwight-Johnson
Pey-Jiuan Lee

Funding

Multifaceted Oncology Depression Program for LatinosR01CA105269 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ELL, KATHLEEN R · 2004 to 2007
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01CA105269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the effectiveness of the Alleviating Depression Among Patients With Cancer (ADAPt-C) collaborative care management for major depression or dysthymia. PATIENTS AND

methodsStudy patients included 472 low-income, predominantly female Hispanic patients with cancer age >or= 18 years with major depression (49%), dysthymia (5%), or both (46%). Patients were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 242) or enhanced usual care (EUC; n = 230). Intervention patients had access for up to 12 months to a depression clinical specialist (supervised by a psychiatrist) who offered education, structured psychotherapy, and maintenance/relapse prevention support. The psychiatrist prescribed antidepressant medications for patients preferring or assessed to require medication.

resultsAt 12 months, 63% of intervention patients had a 50% or greater reduction in depressive symptoms from baseline as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression scale compared with 50% of EUC patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.38; P = .01). Improvement was also found for 5-point decrease in PHQ-9 score among 72.2% of intervention patients compared with 59.7% of EUC patients (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.50; P = .02). Intervention patients also experienced greater rates of depression treatment (72.3% v 10.4% of EUC patients; P < .0001) and significantly better quality-of-life outcomes, including social/family (adjusted mean difference between groups, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.22 to 4.17; P < .001), emotional (adjusted mean difference, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.26 to 2.22; P = .01), functional (adjusted mean difference, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.08 to 2.59; P = .04), and physical well-being (adjusted mean difference, 2.79; 95% CI, 0.49 to 5.1; P = .02).

conclusionADAPt-C collaborative care is feasible and results in significant reduction in depressive symptoms, improvement in quality of life, and lower pain levels compared with EUC for patients with depressive disorders in a low-income, predominantly Hispanic population in public sector oncology clinics.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDysthymic DisorderFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHispanic or LatinoHumansLos AngelesMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental Health ServicesNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPsychotherapyAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID18802161
PMCPMC2653113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.