Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2008
Randomized controlled trial of collaborative care management of depression among low-income patients with cancer.
Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01781013 (Care Management Technology to Facilitate Depression Care in Safety Net Diabetes Clinics), which is not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Care Management Technology to Facilitate Depression Care in Safety Net Diabetes Clinics
Who cites it
106 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Healthcare interventions to improve health outcomes for racially/ethnic minoritised people with multiple long-term conditions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- JPOS/JASCC clinical guidelines for psychological distress in adult cancer patients: a summary of recommendations.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Guideline
- Psychological intervention improves quality of life in patients with early-stage cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Trends, challenges, and priorities for shared decision making in mental health: The first umbrella review.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for immigrant and limited English proficient cancer patients.Psycho-oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Case management interventions in chronic disease reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Is care really shared? A systematic review of collaborative care (shared care) interventions for adult cancer patients with depression.BMC health services research · 2019Pooled it
- Targeting Exercise Interventions to Patients With Cancer in Need: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2018Pooled it
- Effects and moderators of psychosocial interventions on quality of life, and emotional and social function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 22 RCTs.Psycho-oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders.Current psychiatry reports · 2018Pooled it
- Collaborative Care for Depression among Patients with Limited English Proficiency: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Pooled it
- A systematic review of depression psychotherapies among Latinos.Clinical psychology review · 2016Pooled it
- Collaborative chronic care models for mental health conditions: cumulative meta-analysis and metaregression to guide future research and implementation.Medical care · 2013Pooled it
- Effects of screening for psychological distress on patient outcomes in cancer: a systematic review.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2013Pooled it
- Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of efficacy of interventions for elevated depressive symptoms in adults diagnosed with cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2012Pooled it
- Pooled it
46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the effectiveness of the Alleviating Depression Among Patients With Cancer (ADAPt-C) collaborative care management for major depression or dysthymia. PATIENTS AND
methodsStudy patients included 472 low-income, predominantly female Hispanic patients with cancer age >or= 18 years with major depression (49%), dysthymia (5%), or both (46%). Patients were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 242) or enhanced usual care (EUC; n = 230). Intervention patients had access for up to 12 months to a depression clinical specialist (supervised by a psychiatrist) who offered education, structured psychotherapy, and maintenance/relapse prevention support. The psychiatrist prescribed antidepressant medications for patients preferring or assessed to require medication.
resultsAt 12 months, 63% of intervention patients had a 50% or greater reduction in depressive symptoms from baseline as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression scale compared with 50% of EUC patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.38; P = .01). Improvement was also found for 5-point decrease in PHQ-9 score among 72.2% of intervention patients compared with 59.7% of EUC patients (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.50; P = .02). Intervention patients also experienced greater rates of depression treatment (72.3% v 10.4% of EUC patients; P < .0001) and significantly better quality-of-life outcomes, including social/family (adjusted mean difference between groups, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.22 to 4.17; P < .001), emotional (adjusted mean difference, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.26 to 2.22; P = .01), functional (adjusted mean difference, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.08 to 2.59; P = .04), and physical well-being (adjusted mean difference, 2.79; 95% CI, 0.49 to 5.1; P = .02).
conclusionADAPt-C collaborative care is feasible and results in significant reduction in depressive symptoms, improvement in quality of life, and lower pain levels compared with EUC for patients with depressive disorders in a low-income, predominantly Hispanic population in public sector oncology clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.