Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18801282›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2008

Impact of same-day appointments on patient satisfaction with general practice appointment systems.

Fiona Sampson, Mark Pickin, Alicia O'Cathain, Stephen Goodall, Chris Salisbury

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Web-Based Medical Appointment Systems: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  4. Is the shift to urgent appointments in general practice what patients really want?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Satisfaction, demand, and opening hours in primary care: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fiona SampsonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. f.c.sampson@sheffield.ac.uk
Mark Pickin
Alicia O'Cathain
Stephen Goodall
Chris Salisbury

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following recent concerns about patients' inability to book appointments in advance, this study examined the relationship between the proportion of GP appointments reserved for same-day booking, and patient satisfaction with appointment systems. In a survey of 12,825 patients in 47 practices, it was found that a 10% increase in the proportion of same-day appointments was associated with an 8% reduction in the proportion of patients satisfied. Practices should be wary of increasing the level of same-day appointments to meet access targets.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesPatient SatisfactionFamily PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPractice Management, MedicalTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID18801282
PMCPMC2529202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.