Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18801169›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2008

Management of chronic knee pain: a survey of patient preferences and treatment received.

Helene L Mitchell, Michael V Hurley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06554483 (The Effects of Neuroscience Based Proprioceptive Exercise Training in Elderly With Chronic Knee Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06554483 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Neuroscience Based Proprioceptive Exercise Training in Elderly With Chronic Knee Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorPamukkale UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled24ConditionsChronic Knee Pain, Pain, Chronic, ElderlyArmsExercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Group acupuncture for knee pain: evaluation of a cost-saving initiative in the health service.Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helene L MitchellRehabilitation Research Unit (King's College London), Dulwich Community Hospital, London, UK. HMitchell@dmu.ac.uk
Michael V Hurley
De Montfort University · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA range of interventions exist for the management of knee pain, but patient preferences for treatment are not clear. In this study the management received by people with chronic knee pain, their management preferences and reasons for these preferences were recorded.

methodsAt baseline assessment of a clinical trial of rehabilitation for chronic knee pain, 415 participants were asked about their i) previous management, ii) preferred treatment, if any, iii) whether they would undergo knee surgery and iv) reasons for their preferences.

resultsPrevious management--Medication was the most common treatment, followed by physiotherapy, 39 participants had received no treatment. Preferences--166 patients expressed no treatment preference. Of those who expressed a preference the most popular option was physiotherapy, whilst not having surgery was the third most frequent response. The most common reason for preferring physiotherapy and not wanting surgery was prior experience.Willingness to accept surgery--390 participants were not waiting for knee replacement surgery, and overall 81% would not accept surgery if offered, usually because pain was not perceived to be severe enough to warrant surgery.

conclusionMost chronic knee pain is managed with medication despite concerns about safety, efficacy and cost, management guidelines recommendations and people's management preferences. Previous experience and perceptions of need were major determinants of people's preferences, but many people were unaware of management options. Appreciating patient preferences and provision of more information about management options are important in facilitating informed patient/clinician discussion and agreement.

Indexed as

Health SurveysKnee JointPatient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overAntirheumatic AgentsArthralgiaArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeChronic DiseaseEvidence-Based PracticeGuidelines as TopicHumansMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPhysician-Patient RelationsAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID18801169
PMCPMC2556674
OpenAlexW2158568756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.