Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18800968›Full record

ReviewThe Biochemical journal2008

Conformational changes and flexibility in T-cell receptor recognition of peptide-MHC complexes.

Kathryn M Armstrong, Kurt H Piepenbrink, Brian M Baker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Biochemical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Structural plasticity in I-AFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  11. Immunological Mechanisms of Metal Allergies and the Nickel-Specific TCR-pMHC Interface.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Immune aging in diabetes and its implications in wound healing.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn M ArmstrongDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 251 Nieuwland Science Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Kurt H Piepenbrink
Brian M Baker
University of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Chemistry-Biochemistry-Biology Training Program at Notre DameT32GM075762 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI CHANG, MAYLAND F, MOBASHERY, SHAHRIAR · 2007 to 2021
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM067097NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM075762NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM075762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A necessary feature of the immune system, TCR (T-cell receptor) cross-reactivity has been implicated in numerous autoimmune pathologies and is an underlying cause of transplant rejection. Early studies of the interactions of alphabeta TCRs (T-cell receptors) with their peptide-MHC ligands suggested that conformational plasticity in the TCR CDR (complementarity determining region) loops is a dominant contributor to T-cell cross-reactivity. Since these initial studies, the database of TCRs whose structures have been solved both bound and free is now large enough to permit general conclusions to be drawn about the extent of TCR plasticity and the types and locations of motion that occur. In the present paper, we review the conformational differences between free and bound TCRs, quantifying the structural changes that occur and discussing their possible roles in specificity and cross-reactivity. We show that, rather than undergoing major structural alterations or 'folding' upon binding, the majority of TCR CDR loops shift by relatively small amounts. The structural changes that do occur are dominated by hinge-bending motions, with loop remodelling usually occurring near loop apexes. As predicted from previous studies, the largest changes are in the hypervariable CDR3alpha and CDR3beta loops, although in some cases the germline-encoded CDR1alpha and CDR2alpha loops shift in magnitudes that approximate those of the CDR3 loops. Intriguingly, the smallest shifts are in the germline-encoded loops of the beta-chain, consistent with recent suggestions that the TCR beta domain may drive ligand recognition.

Indexed as

AnimalsComplementarity Determining RegionsHumansMajor Histocompatibility ComplexProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, Antigen, T-CellComplementarity Determining RegionsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID18800968
PMCPMC2782316
OpenAlexW2117962428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.