Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1879956›Full record

ArticleInfection1991

Activity of intracellular antibiotics.

P Van der Auwera, G Prinz, G Petrikkos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intracellular Penetration and Effects of Antibiotics onAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P Van der AuweraLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Clinique des Maladies Infectieuses, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
G Prinz
G Petrikkos
Laiko General Hospital of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have studied the intracellular bioactivity of several antimicrobial agents against two strains of Staphylococcus aureus, a pathogen sequestrated in phagolysosomes, using peripheral blood neutrophils from human volunteers. This was compared to the activity of cell-associated drugs also measured in vitro. Several discrepancies (high cellular association, low bioactivity) were observed (coumermycin, glycopeptides, erythromycin and clindamycin) which can be due to the binding of the drug to a particular cellular organelle, to intracellular metabolization or inactivation, to unfavourable conditions in the phagolysosome (pH drop), or to a toxic effect of the drug on the functions of the neutrophil. Addition of the antibiotic during ingestion was frequently associated with better neutrophil-dependent killing through several potential mechanisms: coingestion of the antibiotic with the inoculum, modification of opsonization, release of activating substances and fragilization of the microorganism to oxygen-dependent or -independent killing mechanisms.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiological AvailabilityBiological TransportHumansIntracellular MembranesLysosomesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNeutrophilsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID1879956
OpenAlexW30066487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.