Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18799004›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2008

Strict glycaemic control in patients hospitalised in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit: a randomised clinical trial.

Gisela Del Carmen De La Rosa, Jorge Hernando Donado, Alvaro Humberto Restrepo, Alvaro Mauricio Quintero, Luis Gabriel González, Nora Elena Saldarriaga, Marisol Bedoya, Juan Manuel Toro, Jorge Byron Velásquez, Juan Carlos Valencia and 8 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [S3 Guideline Sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and aftercare : Long version].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Tight Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Children.The New England journal of medicine · 2017
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Design and rationale of safe pediatric euglycemia after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial of tight glycemic control after pediatric cardiac surgery.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2013
    Trial
  20. Trial

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Gisela Del Carmen De La RosaDepartment of Critical Care, Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe, Calle 78B 69-240, Medellin, Colombia. giseladlr@une.net.co
Jorge Hernando Donado
Alvaro Humberto Restrepo
Alvaro Mauricio Quintero
Luis Gabriel González
Nora Elena Saldarriaga
Marisol Bedoya
Juan Manuel Toro
Jorge Byron Velásquez
Juan Carlos Valencia
Clara Maria Arango
Pablo Henrique Aleman
Esdras Martin Vasquez
Juan Carlos Chavarriaga
Andrés Yepes
William Pulido
Carlos Alberto Cadavid
Grupo de Investigacion en Cuidado intensivo: GICI-HPTU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCritically ill patients can develop hyperglycaemia even if they do not have diabetes. Intensive insulin therapy decreases morbidity and mortality rates in patients in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) and decreases morbidity in patients in a medical ICU. The effect of this therapy on patients in a mixed medical/surgical ICU is unknown. Our goal was to assess whether the effect of intensive insulin therapy, compared with standard therapy, decreases morbidity and mortality in patients hospitalised in a mixed ICU.

methodsThis is a prospective, randomised, non-blinded, single-centre clinical trial in a medical/surgical ICU. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intensive insulin therapy to maintain glucose levels between 80 and 110 mg/dl (4.4 to 6.1 mmol/l) or standard insulin therapy to maintain glucose levels between 180 and 200 mg/dl (10 and 11.1 mmol/l). The primary end point was mortality at 28 days.

resultsOver a period of 30 months, 504 patients were enrolled. The 28-day mortality rate was 32.4% (81 of 250) in the standard insulin therapy group and 36.6% (93 of 254) in the intensive insulin therapy group (Relative Risk [RR]: 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85 to 1.42). The ICU mortality in the standard insulin therapy group was 31.2% (78 of 250) and 33.1% (84 of 254) in the intensive insulin therapy group (RR: 1.06; 95%CI: 0.82 to 1.36). There was no statistically significant reduction in the rate of ICU-acquired infections: 33.2% in the standard insulin therapy group compared with 27.17% in the intensive insulin therapy group (RR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.63 to 1.07). The rate of hypoglycaemia (< or = 40 mg/dl) was 1.7% in the standard insulin therapy group and 8.5% in the intensive insulin therapy group (RR: 5.04; 95% CI: 1.20 to 21.12).

conclusionsIIT used to maintain glucose levels within normal limits did not reduce morbidity or mortality of patients admitted to a mixed medical/surgical ICU. Furthermore, this therapy increased the risk of hypoglycaemia.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: 4374-04-13031; 094-2 in 000966421.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAdultAgedBlood GlucoseCritical CareFemaleGlycemic IndexHumansInsulinIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID18799004
PMCPMC2592751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.