Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18798759›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2008

Exploring informed choice in the context of prenatal testing: findings from a qualitative study.

Beth K Potter, Natasha O'Reilly, Holly Etchegary, Heather Howley, Ian D Graham, Mark Walker, Doug Coyle, Yelena Chorny, Mario Cappelli, Isabelle Boland and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Attitudes About NIPT Routinisation: A Report from a Qualitative Study of 20 UK Healthcare Professionals.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Time for a New Norm: Experiences of 'Being Informed' and 'Having Choice' for Prenatal Screening for Chromosomal Conditions: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. It's complicated - Factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A design process for using normative models in shared decision making: a case study in the context of prenatal testing.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014
    Article
  18. Is advice incompatible with autonomous informed choice? Women's perceptions of advice in the context of antenatal screening: a qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beth K PotterDepartment of Epidemiology & Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. bpotter@uottawa.ca
Natasha O'Reilly
Holly Etchegary
Heather Howley
Ian D Graham
Mark Walker
Doug Coyle
Yelena Chorny
Mario Cappelli
Isabelle Boland
Brenda J Wilson
University of Ottawa · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study explored whether and how a sample of women made informed choices about prenatal testing for foetal anomalies; its aim was to provide insights for future health policy and service provision.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 38 mothers in Ottawa, Ontario, all of whom had been offered prenatal tests in at least one pregnancy. Using the Multi-dimensional Measure of Informed Choice as a general guide to analysis, we explored themes relevant to informed choice, including values and knowledge, and interactions with health professionals.

resultsMany, but not all, participants seemed to have made informed decisions about prenatal testing. Values and knowledge were interrelated and important components of informed choice, but the way they were discussed differed from the way they have been presented in scientific literature. In particular, 'values' related to expressions of women's moral views or ideas about 'how life should be lived' and 'knowledge' related to the ways in which women prioritized and interpreted factual information, through their own and others' experiences and in 'thinking through' the personal implications of testing. While some women described non-directive discussions with health professionals, others perceived testing as routine or felt pressured to accept it.

conclusionsOur findings suggest a need for maternity care providers to be vigilant in promoting active decision making about prenatal testing, particularly around the consideration of personal implications. Further development of measures of informed choice may be necessary to fully evaluate decision support tools and to determine whether prenatal testing programmes are meeting their objectives.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrenatal CareAbortion, EugenicAdultDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMiddle AgedMoralsOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy TrimestersPregnant People

Identifiers

PMID18798759
PMCPMC5060463
OpenAlexW2140303106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.