Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18798697›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology2008

Neuroinflammation and microglia: considerations and approaches for neurotoxicity assessment.

Gaylia Jean Harry, Andrew D Kraft

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 312 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. TSPO Radioligands for Neuroinflammation: An Overview.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  19. The ethanolic extract ofFood science & nutrition · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaylia Jean HarryNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Neurotoxicology Group, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. harry@niehs.nih.gov
Andrew D Kraft
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

Neuroimmunotoxicology: autoimmunity, viral, infectious aZ01ES101623 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HARRY, GAYLIA JEAN · 2003 to 2008
$2.8M
Environment Effects and Development of Neuron and GliaZ01ES021164 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HARRY, GAYLIA JEAN · 1997 to 2008
$409k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES021164Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES101623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of an inflammatory response, as well as interactions between the immune and nervous systems, are rapidly assuming major roles in neurodegenerative disease and injury. However, it is now appreciated that the exact nature of such responses can differ with each type of insult and interaction. More recently, neuroinflammation and the associated cellular response of microglia are being considered for their contribution to neurotoxicity of environmental agents; yet, so far, the inclusion of inflammatory end points into neurotoxicity assessment have relied primarily on relatively limited measures or driven by in vitro models of neurotoxicity.

objectiveTo present background information on relevant biological considerations of neuroinflammation and the microglia response demonstrating the complex integrative nature of these biological processes and raising concern with regards to translation of effects demonstrated in vitro to the in vivo situation. Specific points are addressed that would influence the design and interpretation of neuroinflammation with regards to neurotoxicology assessment.

conclusionThere is a complex and dynamic response in the brain to regulate inflammatory processes and maintain a normal homeostatic level. The classification of such responses as beneficial or detrimental is an oversimplification. Neuroinflammation should be considered as a balanced network of processes in which subtle modifications can shift the cells toward disparate outcomes. The tendency to overinterpret data obtained in an isolated culture system should be discouraged. Rather, the use of cross-disciplinary approaches to evaluate several end points should be incorporated into the assessment of inflammatory contributions to the neurotoxicity of environmental exposures.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesDown-RegulationHumansInflammationInflammation MediatorsMicrogliaModels, BiologicalNervous SystemNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurotoxicity SyndromesInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID18798697
PMCPMC2658618
OpenAlexW2078253393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.