Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18797943›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2009

Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Belgium as determined by E-test methodology.

Y Glupczynski, C Berhin, H Nizet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y GlupczynskiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires de Mont-Godinne, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium. youri.glupczynski@skynet.be
C Berhin
H Nizet
CHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to collect recent data on the antibiotic susceptibility of clinically significant anaerobes in Belgium. A total of 333 anaerobic clinical isolates from various body sites were prospectively collected between 2005 and 2007 at two tertiary care hospitals in Belgium. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the E-test method for nine anti-anaerobic antibiotics. Sixty-one percent of the isolates were beta-lactamase producers, which explains the poor activity of penicillin. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, metronidazole and meropenem were very active against most anaerobes, but around 10% of the Bacteroides fragilis group strains were non-susceptible to the two beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors. No resistance was observed to metronidazole, while 3% of the Bacteroides spp. had decreased susceptibility to meropenem (MIC > or = 4 mg/L). Cefoxitin, clindamycin and moxifloxacin were less active, with 33%, 52% and 57% of the B. fragilis group being non-susceptible respectively. Tigecycline showed consistently good activity against most anaerobes with MIC(50) and MIC(90) of 0.25 and 2 mg/L. Metronidazole, amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem remain good empirical choices when anaerobes are expected in our setting. Because of the occurrence of resistance to most classes of current anti-anaerobic antibiotics, it is recommended that the antimicrobial resistance patterns be monitored regularly in order to guide empirical therapy.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteria, AnaerobicBacterial InfectionsBelgiumbeta-LactamasesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID18797943
OpenAlexW2060731678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.