Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18797516›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2008

Tracing sub-structure in the European American population with PCA-informative markers.

Peristera Paschou, Petros Drineas, Jamey Lewis, Caroline M Nievergelt, Deborah A Nickerson, Joshua D Smith, Paul M Ridker, Daniel I Chasman, Ronald M Krauss, Elad Ziv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome-wide Analysis of Common Copy Number Variation and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Investigating the Association of Genetic Admixture and Donor/Recipient Genetic Disparity with Transplant Outcomes.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Peristera PaschouDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupoli, Greece. ppaschou@mbg.duth.gr
Petros Drineas
Jamey Lewis
Caroline M Nievergelt
Deborah A Nickerson
Joshua D Smith
Paul M Ridker
Daniel I Chasman
Ronald M Krauss
Elad Ziv
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USRensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USUniversity of Washington · USDemocritus University of Thrace · GRScripps Research Institute · USUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Systems BiologyU19AG023122 · NIA · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI PAOLA SEBASTIANI · 2004 to 2026
$102.6M
Pharmacogenomics and Risk of Cardiovascular DiseaseU01HL069757 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI KRAUSS, RONALD M · 2001 to 2009
$24.7M
Breast Cancer, Breast Density &Admixture Among LatinasK22CA109351 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZIV, ELAD · 2004 to 2006
$448k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA109351NCI NIH HHS K22CA109351NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL069757NIA NIH HHS U19 AG023122NIA NIH HHS U19 AG23122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic structure in the European American population reflects waves of migration and recent gene flow among different populations. This complex structure can introduce bias in genetic association studies. Using Principal Components Analysis (PCA), we analyze the structure of two independent European American datasets (1,521 individuals-307,315 autosomal SNPs). Individual variation lies across a continuum with some individuals showing high degrees of admixture with non-European populations, as demonstrated through joint analysis with HapMap data. The CEPH Europeans only represent a small fraction of the variation encountered in the larger European American datasets we studied. We interpret the first eigenvector of this data as correlated with ancestry, and we apply an algorithm that we have previously described to select PCA-informative markers (PCAIMs) that can reproduce this structure. Importantly, we develop a novel method that can remove redundancy from the selected SNP panels and show that we can effectively remove correlated markers, thus increasing genotyping savings. Only 150-200 PCAIMs suffice to accurately predict fine structure in European American datasets, as identified by PCA. Simulating association studies, we couple our method with a PCA-based stratification correction tool and demonstrate that a small number of PCAIMs can efficiently remove false correlations with almost no loss in power. The structure informative SNPs that we propose are an important resource for genetic association studies of European Americans. Furthermore, our redundancy removal algorithm can be applied on sets of ancestry informative markers selected with any method in order to select the most uncorrelated SNPs, and significantly decreases genotyping costs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChromosome MappingGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenome, HumanGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisWhite PeopleGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID18797516
PMCPMC2537989
OpenAlexW2067603242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.