Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18797514›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2008

Identification of Drosophila mitotic genes by combining co-expression analysis and RNA interference.

Maria Patrizia Somma, Francesca Ceprani, Elisabetta Bucciarelli, Valeria Naim, Valeria De Arcangelis, Roberto Piergentili, Antonella Palena, Laura Ciapponi, Maria Grazia Giansanti, Claudia Pellacani and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of chromosome/kinetochore-driven microtubule generation in Drosophila spindle assembly.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Journal of cell science · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of Patronin in Drosophila mitosis.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A Topology-Centric View on Mitotic Chromosome Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Patrizia SommaDipartimento di Genetica e Biologia Molecolare, Istituto di Biologia e Patologia Molecolari del CNR, Rome, Italy.
Francesca Ceprani
Elisabetta Bucciarelli
Valeria Naim
Valeria De Arcangelis
Roberto Piergentili
Antonella Palena
Laura Ciapponi
Maria Grazia Giansanti
Claudia Pellacani
Romano Petrucci
Giovanni Cenci
Fiammetta Vernì
Barbara Fasulo
Michael L Goldberg
Ferdinando Di Cunto
Maurizio Gatti
Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology · ITCornell University · USUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNAi screens have, to date, identified many genes required for mitotic divisions of Drosophila tissue culture cells. However, the inventory of such genes remains incomplete. We have combined the powers of bioinformatics and RNAi technology to detect novel mitotic genes. We found that Drosophila genes involved in mitosis tend to be transcriptionally co-expressed. We thus constructed a co-expression-based list of 1,000 genes that are highly enriched in mitotic functions, and we performed RNAi for each of these genes. By limiting the number of genes to be examined, we were able to perform a very detailed phenotypic analysis of RNAi cells. We examined dsRNA-treated cells for possible abnormalities in both chromosome structure and spindle organization. This analysis allowed the identification of 142 mitotic genes, which were subdivided into 18 phenoclusters. Seventy of these genes have not previously been associated with mitotic defects; 30 of them are required for spindle assembly and/or chromosome segregation, and 40 are required to prevent spontaneous chromosome breakage. We note that the latter type of genes has never been detected in previous RNAi screens in any system. Finally, we found that RNAi against genes encoding kinetochore components or highly conserved splicing factors results in identical defects in chromosome segregation, highlighting an unanticipated role of splicing factors in centromere function. These findings indicate that our co-expression-based method for the detection of mitotic functions works remarkably well. We can foresee that elaboration of co-expression lists using genes in the same phenocluster will provide many candidate genes for small-scale RNAi screens aimed at completing the inventory of mitotic proteins.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGenes, InsectRNA InterferenceAnimalsChromosome SegregationCytokinesisDrosophilaMitosisRNA, Double-StrandedSpindle ApparatusRNA, Double-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID18797514
PMCPMC2537813
OpenAlexW2055792343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.