Trial reportBMC neuroscience2008
Effects of the N-methyl-D-Aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on vibrotactile adaptation.
Trial report in BMC neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Theta-burst stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex modulates the tactile acuity of the tongue.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Theta-burst stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex modulates tactile acuity of tongue.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Chronic Neurophysiological Effects of Repeated Head Trauma in Retired Australian Male Sport Athletes.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Induced and Evoked Properties of Vibrotactile Adaptation in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex.Neural plasticity · 2019Article
- An Undergraduate Laboratory Exercise that Demonstrates the Difference Between Peripherally and Centrally Mediated Measures.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2016Article
- Percept of the duration of a vibrotactile stimulus is altered by changing its amplitude.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Article
- Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015Article
- Vibrotactile discriminative capacity is impacted in a digit-specific manner with concurrent unattended hand stimulation.Experimental brain research · 2014Article
- Altering second-order configurations reduces the adaptation effects on early face-sensitive event-related potential components.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Article
- A novel device for the study of somatosensory information processing.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2012Article
- Somatosensory information processing in the aging population.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2011Article
- Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber's Law.Experimental brain research · 2008Article
- Altered central sensitization in subgroups of women with vulvodynia.The Clinical journal of painArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious reports have demonstrated that short durations of vibrotactile stimuli (less than or equal to 2 sec) effectively and consistently modify both the perceptual response in humans as well as the neurophysiological response in somatosensory cortex. The change in cortical response with adaptation has been well established by a number of studies, and other reports have extended those findings in determining that both GABA- and NMDAR-mediated neurotransmission play a significant role in the dynamic response of somatosensory cortical neurons. In this study, we evaluated the impact that dextromethorphan (DXM), an NMDAR antagonist, had on two distinct vibrotactile adaptation tasks.
resultsAll subjects, both those that ingested 60 mg DXM and those that ingested placebo, were evaluated for their amplitude discriminative capacity between two simultaneously delivered vibrotactile stimuli both with and without 3 conditions of pre-exposure to adapting stimulation. The results demonstrated that the perceptual metrics of subjects who ingested 60 mg DXM were significantly altered from that of controls when the amplitude discrimination task followed one of the conditions of adapting stimulation. Without the condition of pre-exposure to an adapting stimulus (or stimuli), there was little difference between the observations obtained from the subjects that ingested DXM and controls. Peak impact on subject response occurred at 60 min post-ingestion, whereas the scores of controls who ingested placebo were not impacted.
conclusionThe results - that DXM blocks vibrotactile adaptation - is consistent with the suggestion that NMDAR-mediated neurotransmission plays a significant role in the perceptual adaptive response. This finding is also consistent with neurophysiological findings that report observations of the effects of NMDAR block on the SI cortical response to repetitive vibrotactile stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.