Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18795111›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2008

CoMFA and CoMSIA 3D-QSAR analysis of DMDP derivatives as anti-cancer agents.

Vivek Srivastava, Ashutosh Kumar, Bhartendu Nath Mishra, Mohammad Imran Siddiqi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vivek SrivastavaDepartment of biotechnology, Institute of engineering and technology, Sitapur road, Lucknow 21.
Ashutosh Kumar
Bhartendu Nath Mishra
Mohammad Imran Siddiqi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) based on three dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) studies were conducted on a series (78 compounds) of 2, 4-diamino-5-methyl-5-deazapteridine (DMDP) derivatives as potent anticancer agents. The best prediction were obtained with a CoMFA standard model (q(2) = 0.530, r(2) = 0.903) and with CoMSIA combined steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic and hydrogen bond donor fields (q(2) = 0.548, r(2) = 0.909). Both models were validated by a test set of ten compounds producing very good predictive r(2) values of 0.935 and 0.842, respectively. CoMFA and CoMSIA contour maps were then used to analyze the structural features of ligands to account for the activity in terms of positively contributing physiochemical properties such as steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic and hydrogen bond donor fields. The resulting contour maps produced by the best CoMFA and CoMSIA models were used to identify the structural features relevant to the biological activity in this series of analogs. This study suggests that the highly electropositive substituents with low steric tolerance are required at 5 position of the pteridine ring and bulky electronegatve substituents are required at the meta-position of the phenyl ring. The information obtained from CoMFA and CoMSIA 3-D contour maps can be used for the design of deazapteridine-based analogs as anticancer agents.

Indexed as

CancerCoMFACoMSIADMDPQSAR

Identifiers

PMID18795111
PMCPMC2533057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.