ArticleOncogene2008
Loss of Hus1 sensitizes cells to etoposide-induced apoptosis by regulating BH3-only proteins.
Article in Oncogene, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The carboxyl-terminal sequence of PUMA binds to both anti-apoptotic proteins and membranes.eLife · 2023Article
- HUS1 as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Urothelial Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Prostate cancer: unmet clinical needs and RAD9 as a candidate biomarker for patient management.Translational cancer research · 2018Article
- DNA damage response genes and the development of cancer metastasis.Radiation research · 2014Review
- An Integrated Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Approach Identifies New BH3-Only Protein Candidates.The open biology journal · 2012Article
- Mutation to Bax beyond the BH3 domain disrupts interactions with pro-survival proteins and promotes apoptosis.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2011Article
- ChIP-Seq of ERalpha and RNA polymerase II defines genes differentially responding to ligands.The EMBO journal · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 (9-1-1) cell cycle checkpoint complex plays a key role in the DNA damage response. Cells with a defective 9-1-1 complex have been shown to be sensitive to apoptosis induced by certain types of genotoxic stress. However, the mechanism linking the loss of a functional 9-1-1 complex to the cell death machinery has yet to be determined. Here, we report that etoposide treatment dramatically upregulates the BH3-only proteins, Bim and Puma, in Hus1-deficient cells. Inhibition of either Bim or Puma expression in Hus1-knockout cells confers significant resistance to etoposide-induced apoptosis, whereas knockdown of both proteins results in further resistance, suggesting that Bim and Puma cooperate in sensitizing Hus1-deficient cells to etoposide treatment. Moreover, we found that Rad9 collaborates with Bim and Puma to sensitize Hus1-deficient cells to etoposide-induced apoptosis. In response to DNA damage, Rad9 localizes to chromatin in Hus1-wild-type cells, whereas in Hus1-deficient cells, it is predominantly located in the cytoplasm where it binds to Bcl-2. Taken together, these results suggest that loss of Hus1 sensitizes cells to etoposide-induced apoptosis not only by inducing Bim and Puma expressions but also by releasing Rad9 into the cytosol to augment mitochondrial apoptosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.