Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18794428›Full record

ArticleArchives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)2008

Importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thin melanoma.

Byron E Wright, Randall P Scheri, Xing Ye, Mark B Faries, Roderick R Turner, Richard Essner, Donald L Morton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. EANM-EORTC general recommendations for sentinel node diagnostics in melanoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2009
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma: Overview and Updates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2021
    Review
  8. Re-evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Byron E WrightDepartment of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California 90404, USA.
Randall P Scheri
Xing Ye
Mark B Faries
Roderick R Turner
Richard Essner
Donald L Morton
Saint John's Health Center · US

Funding

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY WITH COMBINATION THERMO-CHEMOTHERAPYP01CA029605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MORTON, DONALD L · 1985 to 2013
$75.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA29605NCI NIH HHS P01 CA029605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisThe status of the sentinel node (SN) confers important prognostic information for patients with thin melanoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We queried our melanoma database to identify patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin (< or =1.00-mm) cutaneous melanoma at a tertiary care cancer institute. Slides of tumor-positive SNs were reviewed by a melanoma pathologist to confirm nodal status and intranodal tumor burden, defined as isolated tumor cells, micrometastasis, or macrometastasis (< or =0.20, 0.21-2.00, or >2.00 mm, respectively). Nodal status was correlated with patient age and primary tumor depth (< or = 0.25, 0.26-0.50, 0.51-0.75, or 0.76-1.00 mm). Survival was determined by log-rank test.

main outcome measuresDisease-free and melanoma-specific survival.

resultsOf 1592 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy from 1991 to 2004, 631 (40%) had thin melanomas; 31 of the 631 patients (5%) had a tumor-positive SN. At a median follow-up of 57 months for the 631 patients, the mean (SD) 10-year rate of disease-free survival was 96% (1%) vs 54% (10%) for patients with tumor-negative vs tumor-positive SNs, respectively (P < .001); the mean (SD) 10-year rate of melanoma-specific survival was 98% (1%) vs 83% (8%), respectively (P < .001). Tumor-positive SNs were more common in patients aged 50 years and younger (P = .04). The SN status maintained importance on multivariate analysis for both disease-free survival (P < .001) and melanoma-specific survival (P < .001).

conclusionsThe status of the SN is significantly linked to survival in patients with thin melanoma. Therefore, sentinel lymph node biopsy should be considered to obtain complete prognostic information.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID18794428
PMCPMC2561951
OpenAlexW1971125776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.