Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18793787›Full record

ArticleVirology2008

Generation of functionally active HIV-1 specific CD8+ CTL in intestinal mucosa following mucosal, systemic or mixed prime-boost immunization.

Igor M Belyakov, Jeffrey D Ahlers, Gary J Nabel, Bernard Moss, Jay A Berzofsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mucosal immunology of HIV infection.Immunological reviews · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. HIV vaccines: lessons learned and the way forward.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Igor M BelyakovMolecular Immunogenetics and Vaccine Research Section, Vaccine Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; Midwest Research Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. igorbelyakov@yahoo.com
Jeffrey D Ahlers
Gary J Nabel
Bernard Moss
Jay A Berzofsky
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Vaccine and immunotherapy strategies for cancer and viruses causing cancerZIASC004020 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI BERZOFSKY, JAY A · 2009 to 2025
$51.8M
Recombinant Virus VaccinesZIAAI000416 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI MOSS, BERNARD · 2009 to 2025
$17.3M
Recombinant Vaccines for Prevention of AIDS and Other DiseasesZ01AI000416 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI MOSS, BERNARD · 1985 to 2008
$3.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AI000416Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal and vaginal mucosa are major sites of entry in natural HIV infection and therefore the preferred sites to elicit high-avidity CD8+ CTL by vaccination. We directly compare systemic and mucosal immunization in mice after DNA priming and boosting with rgp160 env expressed either in MVA or Ad for their ability to induce mucosal as well as systemic HIV-specific CTL. The optimal CTL response in the gut mucosa was observed after priming with the HIV-1 gp160 env DNA vaccine and boosting with rMVA or rAd encoding the same envelope gene all administered intrarectally (IR). Maximum levels of high-avidity CD8+ T cells were seen in intestinal lamina propria following this regimen. When the prime and boost routes were distinct, the delivery site of the boost had a greater impact than the DNA priming. IM DNA prime and IR rMVA boost were more effective than IR DNA prime and IM rMVA boost for eliciting mucosal CD8+ T-cell avidity. A systemic DNA-prime-followed by systemic rMVA boost induced high levels of high-avidity CD8+ T cells systemically, but responses were undetectable in mucosal sites. A single systemic immunization with rMVA was sufficient to induce high-avidity IFN-gamma secreting CD8+ T cells in systemic organs, whereas a single mucosal immunization with rMVA was not sufficient to elicit high-avidity CD8+ T cells in mucosa. Thus, a heterologous mucosal DNA prime-viral vectored boost strategy was needed. The requirement for a heterologous DNA prime-recombinant viral boost strategy for generation of high-avidity CD8+ T cells in mucosal sites in mice may be more stringent than for the induction of high-avidity CD8+ T cells in systemic compartments.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsCytotoxicity, ImmunologicFemaleHIV-1Immunization, SecondaryIntestinal MucosaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicVaccinationVaccines, DNAAIDS VaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID18793787
PMCPMC4782776
OpenAlexW2014265565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.