ArticleBMC plant biology2008
Small RNA regulation of ovule development in the cotton plant, G. hirsutum L.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- A deletion/duplication in the Ligon lintless-2 locus induces siRNAs that inhibit cotton fiber cell elongation.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- The emerging role of small RNAs in ovule development, a kind of magic.Plant reproduction · 2021Review
- Dissecting the genetic architecture of seed-cotton and lint yields in Upland cotton using genome-wide association mapping.Breeding science · 2019Article
- Molecular Control by Non-coding RNAs During Fruit Development: From Gynoecium Patterning to Fruit Ripening.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
- Differential expression of microRNAs during fiber development between fuzzless-lintless mutant and its wild-type allotetraploid cotton.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Functional Roles of microRNAs in Agronomically Important Plants-Potential as Targets for Crop Improvement and Protection.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Review
- Genome-wide identification and characterization of microRNAs differentially expressed in fibers in a cotton phytochrome A1 RNAi line.PloS one · 2017Article
- A cotton miRNA is involved in regulation of plant response to salt stress.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- RNA Interference for Functional Genomics and Improvement of Cotton (Gossypium sp.).Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
- Response and Tolerance Mechanism of Cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. to Elevated Temperature Stress: A Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
- Identification and Profiling of microRNAs Expressed in Elongating Cotton Fibers Using Small RNA Deep Sequencing.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Review
- Linkage mapping and expression analysis of miRNAs and their target genes during fiber development in cotton.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Global alteration of microRNAs and transposon-derived small RNAs in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) during Cotton leafroll dwarf polerovirus (CLRDV) infection.Plant molecular biology · 2012Article
- Enrichment of a set of microRNAs during the cotton fiber development.BMC genomics · 2009Article
- Methodologies for in vitro cloning of small RNAs and application for plant genome(s).International journal of plant genomics · 2009Article
- Genome-wide analysis reveals rapid and dynamic changes in miRNA and siRNA sequence and expression during ovule and fiber development in allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).Genome biology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe involvement of small RNAs in cotton fiber development is under explored. The objective of this work was to directly clone, annotate, and analyze small RNAs of developing ovules to reveal the candidate small interfering RNA/microRNAs involved in cotton ovule and fiber development.
resultsWe cloned small RNA sequences from 0-10 days post anthesis (DPA) developing cotton ovules. A total of 6691 individual colonies were sequenced from 11 ovule small RNA libraries that yielded 2482 candidate small RNAs with a total of 583 unique sequence signatures. The majority (362, 62.1%) of these 583 sequences were 24 nt long with an additional 145 sequences (24.9%) in the 21 nt to 23 nt size range. Among all small RNA sequence signatures only three mirBase-confirmed plant microRNAs (miR172, miR390 and ath-miR853-like) were identified and only two miRNA-containing clones were recovered beyond 4 DPA. Further, among all of the small RNA sequences obtained from the small RNA pools in developing ovules, only 15 groups of sequences were observed in more than one DPA period. Of these, only five were present in more than two DPA periods. Two of these were miR-172 and miR-390 and a third was identified as 5.8S rRNA sequence. Thus, the vast majority of sequence signatures were expressed in only one DPA period and this included nearly all of the 24 nt sequences. Finally, we observed a distinct DPA-specific expression pattern among our clones based upon sequence abundance. Sequences occurring only once were far more likely to be seen in the 0 to 2 DPA periods while those occurring five or more times were the majority in later periods.
conclusionThis initial survey of small RNA sequences present in developing ovules in cotton indicates that fiber development is under complex small RNA regulation. Taken together, the results of this initial small RNA screen of developing cotton ovules is most consistent with a model, proposed by Baulcombe, that there are networks of small RNAs that are induced in a cascade fashion by the action of miRNAs and that the nature of these cascades can change from tissue to tissue and developmental stage to developmental stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.