ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Large-scale identification of polymorphic microsatellites using an in silico approach.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of Chromosomal Structural Polymorphism inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Streamlining of Simple Sequence Repeat Data Mining Methodologies and Pipelines for Crop Scanning.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- What are microsatellites and how to choose the best tool: a user-friendly review of SSR and 74 SSR mining tools.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- MegaSSR: a web server for large scale microsatellite identification, classification, and marker development.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Pipeline for developing polymorphic microsatellites in species without reference genomes.3 Biotech · 2022Article
- Article
- New Sources of Eastern Filbert Blight Resistance and Simple Sequence Repeat Markers on Linkage Group 6 in Hazelnut (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- MultiplexSSR: A pipeline for developing multiplex SSR-PCR assays from resequencing data.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
- Development of a Genomic Resource and Identification of Nucleotide Diversity of Yellow Perch by RAD Sequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers by using de novo transcriptome assembly of Calanthe masuca and C. sinica (Orchidaceae).BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Article
- High-Throughput Sequencing Strategy for Microsatellite Genotyping Using Neotropical Fish as a Model.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- An Efficient Strategy Combining SSR Markers- and Advanced QTL-seq-driven QTL Mapping Unravels Candidate Genes Regulating Grain Weight in Rice.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- PSR: polymorphic SSR retrieval.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- CandiSSR: An Efficient Pipeline used for Identifying Candidate Polymorphic SSRs Based on Multiple Assembled Sequences.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Article
- Article
- Rapid microsatellite development for tree peony and its implications.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Construction of reference chromosome-scale pseudomolecules for potato: integrating the potato genome with genetic and physical maps.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2013Article
- Genomic analysis of the native European Solanum species, S. dulcamara.BMC genomics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimple Sequence Repeat (SSR) or microsatellite markers are valuable for genetic research. Experimental methods to develop SSR markers are laborious, time consuming and expensive. In silico approaches have become a practicable and relatively inexpensive alternative during the last decade, although testing putative SSR markers still is time consuming and expensive. In many species only a relatively small percentage of SSR markers turn out to be polymorphic. This is particularly true for markers derived from expressed sequence tags (ESTs). In EST databases a large redundancy of sequences is present, which may contain information on length-polymorphisms in the SSR they contain, and whether they have been derived from heterozygotes or from different genotypes. Up to now, although a number of programs have been developed to identify SSRs in EST sequences, no software can detect putatively polymorphic SSRs.
resultsWe have developed PolySSR, a new pipeline to identify polymorphic SSRs rather than just SSRs. Sequence information is obtained from public EST databases derived from heterozygous individuals and/or at least two different genotypes. The pipeline includes PCR-primer design for the putatively polymorphic SSR markers, taking into account Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the flanking regions, thereby improving the success rate of the potential markers. A large number of polymorphic SSRs were identified using publicly available EST sequences of potato, tomato, rice, Arabidopsis, Brassica and chicken.The SSRs obtained were divided into long and short based on the number of times the motif was repeated. Surprisingly, the frequency of polymorphic SSRs was much higher in the short SSRs.
conclusionPolySSR is a very effective tool to identify polymorphic SSRs. Using PolySSR, several hundred putative markers were developed and stored in a searchable database. Validation experiments showed that almost all markers that were indicated as putatively polymorphic by polySSR were indeed polymorphic. This greatly improves the efficiency of marker development, especially in species where there are low levels of polymorphism, like tomato. When combined with the new sequencing technologies PolySSR will have a big impact on the development of polymorphic SSRs in any species.PolySSR and the polymorphic SSR marker database are available from http://www.bioinformatics.nl/tools/polyssr/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.