Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18793125›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2008

Modelling cellular signalling systems.

Padmini Rangamani, Ravi Iyengar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A multiscale model of the regulation of aquaporin 2 recycling.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022
    Article
  11. Conceptual Evolution of Cell Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Paradoxical signaling regulates structural plasticity in dendritic spines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Computational approaches for translational clinical research in disease progression.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2011
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Padmini RangamaniDepartment of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, U.S.A. padmini.rangamani@mssm.edu
Ravi Iyengar

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF DESENSITIZATIONR01GM054508 · NIGMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI IYENGAR, SRINIVAS RAVI V · 1995 to 2016
$8.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell signalling pathways and networks are complex and often non-linear. Signalling pathways can be represented as systems of biochemical reactions that can be modelled using differential equations. Computational modelling of cell signalling pathways is emerging as a tool that facilitates mechanistic understanding of complex biological systems. Mathematical models are also used to generate predictions that may be tested experimentally. In the present chapter, the various steps involved in building models of cell signalling pathways are discussed. Depending on the nature of the process being modelled and the scale of the model, different mathematical formulations, ranging from stochastic representations to ordinary and partial differential equations are discussed. This is followed by a brief summary of some recent modelling successes and the state of future models.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSignal TransductionAnimalsCellsHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID18793125
PMCPMC3270941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.