ArticleThe protein journal2008
Using genome-wide protein sequence data to predict amino acid conservation.
Article in The protein journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Random acceleration and steered molecular dynamics simulations reveal the (un)binding tunnels in adenosine deaminase and critical residues in tunnels.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Sequence conservation in the prediction of catalytic sites.The protein journal · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For most proteins, multiple sequence alignments are a viable method to identify functionally and structurally important amino acids, but for most organisms, there is a subset of proteins that are unique or found in a few closely related organisms. For these proteins, it is not possible to produce sequence alignments that are useful in identifying functionally or structurally important amino acids. We have investigated the relationship between amino acid conservation and five factors (the amino acid's identity, N-terminal neighbor, C-terminal neighbor, the local hydropathy of surrounding amino acids, and the local expected net charge of the surrounding amino acids based on the primary sequence) in Escherichia coli proteins. For four of the factors examined (all but the amino acid's identity), there is a significant relationship with conservation for some of the standard 20 amino acids. Using the combination of all five factors, we show that it is possible to calculate a score based on the primary sequences of a subset of E. coli proteins that has statistically significant predictive value with respect to predicting conserved amino acids in other E. coli proteins and Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins. As these five variables show significant relationships with conservation, we have termed them conservation factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.