Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18791104›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2008

Postfracture care for older women: gaps between optimal care and actual care.

Colleen J Metge, William D Leslie, Lori-Jean Manness, Marina Yogendran, C K Yuen, Brent Kvern, Maximizing Osteoporosis Management in Manitoba Steering Committee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Trial
  3. Patients 80 + have similar medication initiation rates to those aged 50-79 in Ontario FLS.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A survey of outcomes and management of patients post fragility fractures in China.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. [Osteoporosis: therapy in interface management].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The contributions of First Nations ethnicity, income, and delays in surgery on mortality post-fracture: a population-based analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2013
    Article
  13. A population-based analysis of the post-fracture care gap 1996-2008: the situation is not improving.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Article
  14. The post-fracture care gap among Canadian First Nations peoples: a retrospective cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Mortality rates after incident non-traumatic fractures in older men and women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Article
  18. Accident or osteoporosis?: Survey of community follow-up after low-trauma fracture.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2011
    Article
  19. Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap in women: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Article
  20. Recent advances in managing osteoporosis.F1000 medicine reports · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colleen J MetgeFaculty of Pharmacy at Manitoba Centre for Health Policy in Department of Community Health Sciences in Faculty of Medicine at University of Manitoba in Winnipeg. c_metge@umanitoba.ca
William D Leslie
Lori-Jean Manness
Marina Yogendran
C K Yuen
Brent Kvern
Maximizing Osteoporosis Management in Manitoba Steering Committee
Manitoba Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate rates of assessment and treatment of osteoporosis among older women during the year after they have had fractures.

designObservational, historical, population-based cohort study.

settingManitoba, which maintains a comprehensive population-based repository of health care services provided and has a publicly funded health care system.

participantsWomen 50 years old and older who had suffered fractures between 1997 and 2002. These women were chosen from among approximately 175,000 women of this age in Manitoba.

methodsWe examined each woman's annual medical record between April 1, 1997, and March 31, 2002, to find any International Classification of Diseases fracture codes that have been consistently associated with osteoporosis. We looked for postfracture care during the first 12 months after fractures: bone mineral density (BMD) testing or treated with osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Analysis was stratified by type of fracture: designated type 1 fractures (spine or hip) and type 2 fractures (not spine or hip).

main outcome measuresUse of BMD testing or osteoporosis pharmacotherapy during the first 12 months following fractures.

resultsFor type 1 fractures, BMD assessment during the first year after fracture increased from 2.6% in 1997-1998 to 4.6% in 2001-2002 (P for trend .0004). Rates of therapy with osteoporosis medication increased from 4.9% in 1997-1998 to 17.6% in 2001-2002 (P for trend < .0001). Results were similar for type 2 fractures. In the final year of the study, only 20.5% of women with either type of fracture underwent any identifiable intervention (BMD assessment or osteoporosis pharmacotherapy). The intervention rate was substantially higher among women 50 to 64 years old (26.4%) than among those 75 years old or older (17.9%, P for trend < .0001).

conclusionWomen at highest risk of future fractures are assessed infrequently for osteoporosis with BMD testing and given pharmacotherapy to prevent future fractures just as infrequently. This gap in care was particularly striking for BMD testing despite the fact that testing is free in Manitoba's publicly funded system. Data from this study could be educational for physicians treating osteoporosis and should encourage them to improve their practice patterns and optimize patient care.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAgedBone Density Conservation AgentsComorbidityDiphosphatesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, BoneHumansManitobaMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPatient CarePreventive Health ServicesSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphatesSelective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Identifiers

PMID18791104
PMCPMC2553471
OpenAlexW1904335908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.