Gauging to gain: primary care performance measurement.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Organizational attributes of interprofessional primary care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in ontario, Canada: a multiple case study.BMC family practice · 2021
   Article
2. Inadequate performance measures affecting practices, organizations and outcomes of Ontario's family health teams.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2014
   Article
3. Assessing methods for measurement of clinical outcomes and quality of care in primary care practices.BMC health services research · 2012
   Article
4. Conducting waiting room surveys in practice-based primary care research: a user's guide.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2010
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as