ArticleBMC health services research2008
Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care.
Article in BMC health services research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The economic burden of treating uncomplicated hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic literature review.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- Socioeconomic inequalities in primary-care and specialist physician visits: a systematic review.International journal for equity in health · 2021Pooled it
- Benchmarking Cervical Cancer Care Pathways-Measuring Timelines and Identifying Factors Associated With Delay for Women Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy in New South Wales, Australia.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- The expectation-perception gap in primary healthcare quality: a study of Iranian older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Assessing the costs of antenatal care in Eastern Ethiopia: implications for improving the free maternity services policy.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Is Public-Private Partnership a Significant Factor when Achieving Horizontal Equity in Public Healthcare Resources in Spain?The International journal of health planning and management · 2025Article
- Utilization of second medical opinions as a function of the payment method.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Impact of public versus non public insurance on hispanic kidney transplant outcomes using UNOS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparing the Knowledge and Awareness of Dental Students, Dental Practitioners and Patients About Botulinum Toxin and Its Therapeutic Applications in Temporomandibular Disorders.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Inequity in the utilization of the home and community integrated healthcare and daily care services in older adults with limited mobility in China.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Building the plane while it's flying: implementation lessons from integrating a co-located exercise clinic into oncology care.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Inequalities by Income in the Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease and Its Risk Factors in the Adult Population of Catalonia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Use of outpatient and inpatient health care services by occupation-a register study of employees in Oulu, Finland.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Use of Health Services and Rehabilitation before and after the Beginning of Long-Term Sickness Absence-Comparing the Use by Employment and Disability Pension Transition after the Sickness Absence in Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Characteristics of Clinics without National Health Insurance Contracts: A Nationwide Survey in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic differences in psychiatric treatment before and after self-harm: an observational study of 4,280 adolescents and young adults.BMC psychiatry · 2022Observational
- Associations of Medical Visits with Dentist Visits: A Register-Linkage Study of a Working-Age Population in Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Frequent attenders of three outpatient health care schemes in Finland: characteristics and association with long-term sickness absences, 2016-2018.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Mental Illness Inequalities by Multimorbidity, Use of Health Resources and Socio-Economic Status in an Aging Society.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies in wealthy countries suggest that utilization of GP and hospital services, after adjusting for health care need, is equitable or pro-poor, whereas specialist care tends to favour the better off. Horizontal equity in these studies has not been evaluated appropriately, since the use of healthcare services is analysed without distinguishing between public and private services. The purpose of this study is to estimate the relation between socioeconomic position and health services use to determine whether the findings are compatible with the attainment of horizontal equity: equal use of public healthcare services for equal need.
methodsData from a sample of 18,837 Spanish subjects were analysed to calculate the percentage of use of public and private general practitioner (GP), specialist and hospital care according to three indicators of socioeconomic position: educational level, social class and income. The percentage ratio was used to estimate the magnitude of the relation between each measure of socioeconomic position and the use of each health service.
resultsAfter adjusting for age, sex and number of chronic diseases, a gradient was observed in the magnitude of the percentage ratio for public GP visits and hospitalisation: persons in the lowest socioeconomic position were 61-88% more likely to visit public GPs and 39-57% more likely to use public hospitalisation than those in the highest socioeconomic position. In general, the percentage ratio did not show significant socioeconomic differences in the use of public sector specialists. The magnitude of the percentage ratio in the use of the three private services also showed a socioeconomic gradient, but in exactly the opposite direction of the gradient observed in the public services.
conclusionThese findings show inequity in GP visits and hospitalisations, favouring the lower socioeconomic groups, and equity in the use of the specialist physician. These inequities could represent an overuse of public healthcare services or could be due to the fact that persons in high socioeconomic positions choose to use private health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.