Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18788985›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2008

Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among disabled women aged 40-75: does quality of the experience matter?

Sze Y Liu, Melissa A Clark

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Breast cancer screening barriers and disability.Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sze Y LiuDepartment of Community Health, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA.
Melissa A Clark
Rhode Island Department of Health · US

Funding

COMPREHENSIVE CANCER SCREENINGS AMONG UNMARRIED WOMENK07CA087070 · NCI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, MELISSA A · 2000 to 2005
$464k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA087070NCI NIH HHS K07-CA87070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with disabilities (WWD) face significant barriers accessing healthcare, which may affect rates of routine preventive services. We examined the relationship between disability status and routine breast and cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older unmarried women and the differences in reported quality of the screening experience.

methodsData were from a 2003-2005 cross-sectional survey of 630 unmarried women in Rhode Island, 40-75 years of age, stratified by marital status (previously vs. never married) and partner gender (women who partner with men exclusively [WPM] vs. women who partner with women exclusively or with both women and men [WPW]).

resultsWWD were more likely than those without a disability to be older, have a high school education or less, have household incomes <$30,000, be unemployed, and identify as nonwhite. In addition, WWD were less likely to report having the mammogram or Pap test procedure explained and more likely to report that the procedures were difficult to perform. After adjustment for important demographic characteristics, we found no differences in cancer screening behaviors by disability status. However, the quality of the cancer screening experience was consistently and significantly associated with likelihood of routine cancer screening.

conclusionsHigher quality of cancer screening experience was significantly associated with likelihood of having routine breast and cervical cancer screening. Further studies should explore factors that affect quality of the screening experience, including facility characteristics and interactions with medical staff.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLogistic ModelsMammographyMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPersons with DisabilitiesQuality of Health CareRhode Island

Identifiers

PMID18788985
PMCPMC2944439
OpenAlexW2128050761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.