Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18786826›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2008

Structure, dynamics and function of nuclear pore complexes.

Maximiliano A D'Angelo, Martin W Hetzer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 219 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
219citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

219 citing papers in PubMed, 377 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ultrastructural Visualization of the Nuclear Envelope in HeLa Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. How the chromatin landscape influences nuclear morphology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maximiliano A D'AngeloMolecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Martin W Hetzer
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

REGULATION OF NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX ASSEMBLYR01GM057438 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HETZER, MARTIN W, WENTE, SUSAN R. · 1998 to 2011
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear pore complexes are large aqueous channels that penetrate the nuclear envelope, thereby connecting the nuclear interior with the cytoplasm. Until recently, these macromolecular complexes were viewed as static structures, the only function of which was to control the molecular trafficking between the two compartments. It has now become evident that this simplistic scenario is inaccurate and that nuclear pore complexes are highly dynamic multiprotein assemblies involved in diverse cellular processes ranging from the organization of the cytoskeleton to gene expression. In this review, we discuss the most recent developments in the nuclear-pore-complex field, focusing on the assembly, disassembly, maintenance and function of this macromolecular structure.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusChromatinCytoskeletonHumansMitosisNuclear EnvelopeNuclear PoreNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeChromatinNuclear Pore Complex Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18786826
PMCPMC2697926
OpenAlexW2158248025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.