ArticleGenomics2008
High fidelity of whole-genome amplified DNA on high-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrays.
Article in Genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful use of whole genome amplified DNA from multiple source types for high-density Illumina SNP microarrays.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Variant discovery in targeted resequencing using whole genome amplified DNA.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Sortilin receptor 1 predicts longitudinal cognitive change.Neurobiology of aging · 2013Article
- Inter-chromosomal level of genome organization and longevity-related phenotypes in humans.Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2013Article
- Characterization of whole genome amplified (WGA) DNA for use in genotyping assay development.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses.BMC research notes · 2011Article
- Copy number and loss of heterozygosity detected by SNP array of formalin-fixed tissues using whole-genome amplification.PloS one · 2011Article
- Article
- Fine-scaled human genetic structure revealed by SNP microarrays.Genome research · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current microarray technology allows researchers to genotype a large number of SNPs with relatively small amounts of DNA. Nevertheless, researchers and clinicians still frequently face the problem of acquiring enough high-quality DNA for analysis. Whole-genome amplification (WGA) methods offer a solution for this problem, and earlier studies have shown that WGA samples perform reasonably well in small-scale genetic analyses (e.g. Affymetrix 10K array). To determine the performance of WGA products on a large-scale genotyping array, we compared the Affymetrix 250K array genotyping results of genomic DNA and their WGA products from four individuals. Our results indicate that WGA product performs well on the 250K array compared to genomic DNA, especially when using the BRLMM calling algorithm. WGA samples have high call rates (97.5% on average, compared to 99.4% for genomic DNA) and excellent concordance rates with their corresponding genomic DNA samples (98.7% on average). In addition, no apparent systematic genomic amplification bias can be detected. This study demonstrates that, although there is a slight decrease in the total call rates, WGA methods provide a reliable approach for increasing the amount of DNA samples for use with a common SNP genotyping array.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.