Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18786381›Full record

ReviewCurrent biology : CB2008

Temporal organization of the cell cycle.

John J Tyson, Bela Novak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current biology : CB, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mitotic Disruption and Cytoskeletal Alterations Induced byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inducible degradation-coupled phosphoproteomics identifies PP2AFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The circadian clock and metabolic homeostasis: entangled networks.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  20. RNA Helicases as Shadow Modulators of Cell Cycle Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John J TysonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA. tyson@vt.edu
Bela Novak

Funding

Stochastic Models of Cell Cycle Regulation in EukaryotesR01GM078989 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI PECCOUD, JEAN M, TYSON, JOHN J. · 2006 to 2018
$5.3M
Experimental and Computational Studies of Exit from Mitosis in Budding YeastR01GM079207 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI TYSON, JOHN J. · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078989NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM078989NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079207NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM079207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coordination of growth, DNA replication and division in proliferating cells can be adequately explained by a 'clock + checkpoint' model. The clock is an underlying cyclical sequence of states; the checkpoints ensure that the cycle proceeds without mistakes. From the molecular complexities of the control system in modern eukaryotes, we isolate a simple network of positive and negative feedbacks that embodies a 'clock + checkpoints'. The model accounts for the fundamental physiological properties of mitotic cell divisions, evokes a new view of the meiotic program, and suggests how the control system may have evolved in the first place.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell CycleCyclin-Dependent KinasesEukaryotic CellsCyclin-Dependent Kinases

Identifiers

PMID18786381
PMCPMC2856080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.