Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18785950›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2008

Early Barrett's carcinoma with "low-risk" submucosal invasion: long-term results of endoscopic resection with a curative intent.

Hendrik Manner, Andrea May, Oliver Pech, Liebwin Gossner, Thomas Rabenstein, Erwin Günter, Michael Vieth, Manfred Stolte, Christian Ell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03222635 (Endoscopic Management of Patients With High Risk T1a and T1b N0M0 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03222635 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Endoscopic Management of Patients With High Risk T1a and T1b N0M0 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: a Prospective Multicenter Registry.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMCRan2017 to 2028Enrolled225ConditionsSubmucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Barrett Esophagus, High-risk Mucosal Esophageal AdenocarcinomaArmsEndoscopic follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hendrik MannerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, HSK Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Andrea May
Oliver Pech
Liebwin Gossner
Thomas Rabenstein
Erwin Günter
Michael Vieth
Manfred Stolte
Christian Ell
Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden · DEBayreuth Medical Center · DEStädtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic therapy (ET) has become a less risky alternative to open surgery in mucosal Barrett's cancer (BC) because of the very low risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis. Recently published surgical series demonstrated that even in case of minimal submucosal invasion of BC, the risk for LN metastasis is very low. In consequence, also these patients might be eligible for curative ET. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection (ER) in these patients.

methodsFrom September 1996 to September 2003, the suspicion or definite diagnosis of submucosal BC was made in 80 patients referred to our department. Of those, 21 patients (20 male [95.2%], mean age 62 +/- 9 yr, range 47-78) fulfilled the definition of "low-risk" submucosal cancer: invasion of the upper submucosal third (sm1), absence of infiltration into lymph vessels/veins, histological grade G1/2, and macroscopic type I/II. ET was carried out using ER with the suck-and-cut technique with or without an additive ablation of non-neoplastic remnants of Barrett's esophagus.

resultsOne of the 21 patients was referred to surgery directly after the detection of sm1 invasion at the beginning of the study. One patient died (not tumor-related) before completion of ET. Using definitive ET, complete remission (CR) was achieved in 18 of 19 patients (95%) after a mean of 5.3 months (range 1-18) and a mean of 2.9 resections (range 1-9). Only one minor complication (bleeding without drop in hemoglobin level >2 g/dL) occurred (5% of patients). During a mean follow-up (FU) of 62 months (range 45-89), recurrent or metachronous carcinomas were found in 5 patients (28%). Repeat ET was carried out successfully using ER (4 patients) and argon plasma coagulation (1 patient). In one of the 19 patients (5%), tumor freedom had not been achieved after a total of 2 ER. This patient died of a heart attack before surgery could be performed. The calculated 5-yr survival rate of all 21 patients was 66%. No tumor-related death occurred.

conclusionsAs in mucosal BC, ER is associated with favorable outcomes even in case of "low-risk" submucosal BC. Further and larger clinical trials are required before a general recommendation for ER as the treatment of choice in "low-risk" submucosal BC can be given.

Indexed as

Neoplasm InvasivenessAgedBarrett EsophagusCarcinomaDiagnosis, DifferentialEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEndosonographyEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID18785950
OpenAlexW2007592179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.