Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18784837›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

Functional copy-number alterations in cancer.

Barry S Taylor, Jordi Barretina, Nicholas D Socci, Penelope Decarolis, Marc Ladanyi, Matthew Meyerson, Samuel Singer, Chris Sander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Copy number alteration burden predicts prostate cancer relapse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. RETRACTED:Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical and Molecular Spectrum of Liposarcoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barry S TaylorComputational Biology Center, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America. copy-number@cbio.mskcc.org
Jordi Barretina
Nicholas D Socci
Penelope Decarolis
Marc Ladanyi
Matthew Meyerson
Samuel Singer
Chris Sander
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA PROGRAM PROJECTP01CA047179 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI LADANYI, MARC · 1989 to 2010
$17.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA047179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the molecular basis of cancer requires characterization of its genetic defects. DNA microarray technologies can provide detailed raw data about chromosomal aberrations in tumor samples. Computational analysis is needed (1) to deduce from raw array data actual amplification or deletion events for chromosomal fragments and (2) to distinguish causal chromosomal alterations from functionally neutral ones. We present a comprehensive computational approach, RAE, designed to robustly map chromosomal alterations in tumor samples and assess their functional importance in cancer. To demonstrate the methodology, we experimentally profile copy number changes in a clinically aggressive subtype of soft-tissue sarcoma, pleomorphic liposarcoma, and computationally derive a portrait of candidate oncogenic alterations and their target genes. Many affected genes are known to be involved in sarcomagenesis; others are novel, including mediators of adipocyte differentiation, and may include valuable therapeutic targets. Taken together, we present a statistically robust methodology applicable to high-resolution genomic data to assess the extent and function of copy-number alterations in cancer.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticChromosome AberrationsCluster AnalysisGene AmplificationGene DosageGene Expression ProfilingGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsPhenotypePoisson DistributionPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID18784837
PMCPMC2527508
OpenAlexW2134034024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.