Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18783594›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008

LOMA: a fast method to generate efficient tagged-random primers despite amplification bias of random PCR on pathogens.

Wah Heng Lee, Christopher W Wong, Wan Yee Leong, Lance D Miller, Wing Kin Sung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Pathogen chip for respiratory tract infections.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wah Heng LeeGenome Institute of Singapore, Genome, Singapore. leewhc@gis.a-star.edu.sg
Christopher W Wong
Wan Yee Leong
Lance D Miller
Wing Kin Sung

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathogen detection using DNA microarrays has the potential to become a fast and comprehensive diagnostics tool. However, since pathogen detection chips currently utilize random primers rather than specific primers for the RT-PCR step, bias inherent in random PCR amplification becomes a serious problem that causes large inaccuracies in hybridization signals.

resultsIn this paper, we study how the efficiency of random PCR amplification affects hybridization signals. We describe a model that predicts the amplification efficiency of a given random primer on a target viral genome. The prediction allows us to filter false-negative probes of the genome that lie in regions of poor random PCR amplification and improves the accuracy of pathogen detection. Subsequently, we propose LOMA, an algorithm to generate random primers that have good amplification efficiency. Wet-lab validation showed that the generated random primers improve the amplification efficiency significantly.

conclusionThe blind use of a random primer with attached universal tag (random-tagged primer) in a PCR reaction on a pathogen sample may not lead to a successful amplification. Thus, the design of random-tagged primers is an important consideration when performing PCR.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareArtifactsBase SequenceData Interpretation, StatisticalDNA PrimersDNA, ViralMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNADNA PrimersDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID18783594
PMCPMC2553803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.