Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18781156›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2008

DNA vaccines: ready for prime time?

Michele A Kutzler, David B Weiner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 481 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
481citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

481 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,061 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Development of mRNA vaccines against herpes zoster.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

421 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michele A KutzlerDivision of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, The Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102, USA.
David B Weiner
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Novel Vaccines for SmallpoxU01AI054988 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WEINER, DAVID B. · 2003 to 2007
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI054988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery, over a decade and a half ago, that genetically engineered DNA can be delivered in vaccine form and elicit an immune response, there has been much progress in understanding the basic biology of this platform. A large amount of data has been generated in preclinical model systems, and more sustained cellular responses and more consistent antibody responses are being observed in the clinic. Four DNA vaccine products have recently been approved, all in the area of veterinary medicine. These results suggest a productive future for this technology as more optimized constructs, better trial designs and improved platforms are being brought into the clinic.

Indexed as

Animal DiseasesAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansImmunityImmunotherapyModels, BiologicalVaccines, DNAVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID18781156
PMCPMC4317294
OpenAlexW2065818546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.