ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2010
Health insurance and access to care for families with young children in California, 2001-2005: differences by immigration status.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disentangling the Consequences of Latino Immigrants' Unauthorized Status for the Health of Their U.S.-Born Children.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- American clusters: using machine learning to understand health and health care disparities in the United States.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Factors in Immigrant Children's Use of Physician and Dentist Visits, Hospital Care, and Prescribed Medication in the United States.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023Article
- A social determinants framework identifying state-level immigrant policies and their influence on health.SSM - population health · 2019Article
- Policies of Exclusion: Implications for the Health of Immigrants and Their Children.Annual review of public health · 2019Review
- State-Level Immigrant Prenatal Health Care Policy and Inequities in Health Insurance Among Children in Mixed-Status Families.Global pediatric health · 2019Article
- Legal Status, Time in the USA, and the Well-Being of Latinos in Los Angeles.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2017Article
- SEARCHING FOR THE FAMILY LEGAL STATUS OF MEXICAN-ORIGIN CHILDREN: A PRIMER ON DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT STRATEGIES.Journal of family issues · 2017Article
- Legal Status and Health Care: Mexican-Origin Children in California, 2001-2014.Population research and policy review · 2016Article
- Family legal status and health: Measurement dilemmas in studies of Mexican-origin children.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2015Article
- Can we spin straw into gold? An evaluation of immigrant legal status imputation approaches.Demography · 2015Article
- Barriers to health care for undocumented immigrants: a literature review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2015Review
- Implementing federal health reform in the States: who is included and excluded and what are their characteristics?Health services research · 2014Article
- Disparities in disability after traumatic brain injury among Hispanic children and adolescents.Pediatrics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo examine differences and trends in health insurance coverage and access to care for California families by immigration status.
methodsCross-sectional data on 37,236 families with young children <18 years of age from the 2001, 2003 and 2005 California Health Interview Survey are used to assess trends in health insurance and access to care for children and their parents by four immigration dyads: (1) both are Citizens; (2) child is a legal resident/citizen, and parent is legal resident (Documented); (3) child is a citizen, and parent is undocumented (Mixed); and (4) both are Undocumented.
resultsBefore and after adjustment for covariates, only children in Undocumented dyads were less likely than Citizen dyads to have insurance (OR = 0.20, CI: 0.16-0.26) and all three measures of access: physician visits (OR = 0.69, CI: 0.52-0.91), dental visits (OR = 0.47, CI: 0.35-0.63), and a regular source of care (OR = 0.51, CI: 0.37-0.69). Parents in all non-Citizen dyads had poorer access than Citizen dyads across all measures, with the exception of dental visits and a regular source for parents in Documented dyads. Children of all dyads except Citizens were more likely to be insured in 2005 vs. 2001. The largest gain was for undocumented dyad children with 2.77 times higher odds (CI: 1.62-4.75) of being insured in 2005 vs. 2001. All children dyads except Mixed were also more likely to have a physician visit. For parents, there was only a decrease in insurance coverage for Citizen dyads (OR = 0.79, CI: 0.67-0.93) and few changes in access. Conclusions While there were relatively few disparities and some improvements in insurance coverage and access for children in California (except for undocumented children), concomitant changes for parents were not observed. Without attention to the family in health care reforms, disparities may not fully resolve for children and may continue or even increase for parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.