Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18779351›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2008

Effect of protein binding on the pharmacological activity of highly bound antibiotics.

Stephan Schmidt, Katharina Röck, Martina Sahre, Olaf Burkhardt, Martin Brunner, Maximilian T Lobmeyer, Hartmut Derendorf

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Misconceptions among medicinal chemists regarding ADME and PK optimization.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephan SchmidtDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Florida, College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0494, USA.
Katharina Röck
Martina Sahre
Olaf Burkhardt
Martin Brunner
Maximilian T Lobmeyer
Hartmut Derendorf
University of Florida · USMedical University of Vienna · ATMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During antibiotic drug development, media are frequently spiked with either serum/plasma or protein supplements to evaluate the effect of protein binding. Usually, previously reported serum or plasma protein binding values are applied in the analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate this approach by experimentally measuring free, unbound concentrations for antibiotics with reportedly high protein binding and their corresponding antimicrobial activities in media containing commonly used protein supplements. Free, unbound ceftriaxone and ertapenem concentrations were determined in bacterial growth medium with and without bovine/human serum albumin, as well as adult bovine serum and human plasma using in vitro microdialysis. The corresponding antimicrobial activity was determined in MIC and time-kill curve experiments using Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 6303 as test strains. A semimechanistic maximum effect model was simultaneously fitted to the data and respective EC(50) (concentration at half-maximum effect) values compared. Protein binding differed significantly for ceftriaxone (P < 0.05) between human plasma (76.8 +/- 11.0%) and commercially available bovine (20.2 +/- 8.3%) or human serum albumin (56.9 +/- 16.6%). Similar results were obtained for ertapenem (human plasma, 73.8 +/- 11.6%; bovine serum albumin, 12.4 +/- 4.8%; human serum albumin, 17.8 +/- 11.5%). The MICs and EC(50)s of both strains were significantly increased (P < 0.05) for ceftriaxone when comparing human and bovine serum albumin, whereas the EC(50)s were not significantly different for ertapenem. Free, unbound antibiotic concentrations differed substantially between plasma and protein supplements and correlated well with antimicrobial efficacy. Therefore, free, active concentrations should be measured in the test system instead of correcting for literature protein binding values.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsBlood ProteinsCattleCeftriaxoneDrug DiscoveryErtapenemEscherichia coliHumansIn Vitro TechniquesModels, BiologicalProtein BindingSerum AlbuminSerum Albumin, BovineStreptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsBlood ProteinsCeftriaxoneErtapenemSerum AlbuminSerum Albumin, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID18779351
PMCPMC2573140
OpenAlexW2135314048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.