Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18778858›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2008

Polyglutamine neurodegeneration: protein misfolding revisited.

Aislinn J Williams, Henry L Paulson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 194 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
194citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

194 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. HSF1 and Its Role in Huntington's Disease Pathology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  20. A novel SATB1 protein isoform with different biophysical properties.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article

134 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aislinn J WilliamsProgram in Neuroscience and Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Iowa, 2206 MERF, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Henry L Paulson

Funding

Mechanisms of Polyglutamine NeurodegenerationR01NS038712 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PAULSON, HENRY L · 2000 to 2019
$8.1M
Toxic intermediates and protein quality control in SCA3F31NS056609 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WILLIAMS, AISLINN J · 2007 to 2010
$78k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS056609NINDS NIH HHS NS056609NINDS NIH HHS NS38712NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyglutamine diseases are a major cause of neurodegeneration worldwide. Recent studies highlight the importance of protein quality control mechanisms in regulating polyglutamine-induced toxicity. Here we discuss a model of disease pathogenesis that integrates current understanding of the role of protein folding in polyglutamine disease with emerging evidence that alterations in native protein interactions contribute to toxicity. We also incorporate new findings on other age-related neurodegenerative diseases in an effort to explain how protein aggregation and normal aging processes might be involved in polyglutamine disease pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAgingAnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalNerve DegenerationNeurotoxicity SyndromesPeptidesPeptidespolyglutamine

Identifiers

PMID18778858
PMCPMC2580745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.