Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18776033›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2008

Cryptosporidium source tracking in the Potomac River watershed.

Wenli Yang, Plato Chen, Eric N Villegas, Ronald B Landy, Charles Kanetsky, Vitaliano Cama, Theresa Dearen, Cherie L Schultz, Kenneth G Orndorff, Gregory J Prelewicz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Pathology of cryptosporidiosis in raccoons: case series and retrospective analysis, 1990-2019.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2021
    Article
  5. Diverse Genotypes and Species ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Subtype analysis of zoonotic pathogen Cryptosporidium skunk genotype.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Public health significance of zoonoticInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Highly divergent 18S rRNA gene paralogs in a Cryptosporidium genotype from eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus).Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wenli YangNational Center for Infectious Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA.
Plato Chen
Eric N Villegas
Ronald B Landy
Charles Kanetsky
Vitaliano Cama
Theresa Dearen
Cherie L Schultz
Kenneth G Orndorff
Gregory J Prelewicz
Miranda H Brown
Kim Roy Young
Lihua Xiao

Funding

PHS HHS DW75922331-01-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better characterize Cryptosporidium in the Potomac River watershed, a PCR-based genotyping tool was used to analyze 64 base flow and 28 storm flow samples from five sites in the watershed. These sites included two water treatment plant intakes, as well as three upstream sites, each associated with a different type of land use. The uses, including urban wastewater, agricultural (cattle) wastewater, and wildlife, posed different risks in terms of the potential contribution of Cryptosporidium oocysts to the source water. Cryptosporidium was detected in 27 base flow water samples and 23 storm flow water samples. The most frequently detected species was C. andersoni (detected in 41 samples), while 14 other species or genotypes, almost all wildlife associated, were occasionally detected. The two common human-pathogenic species, C. hominis and C. parvum, were not detected. Although C. andersoni was common at all four sites influenced by agriculture, it was largely absent at the urban wastewater site. There were very few positive samples as determined by Environmental Protection Agency method 1623 at any site; only 8 of 90 samples analyzed (9%) were positive for Cryptosporidium as determined by microscopy. The genotyping results suggest that many of the Cryptosporidium oocysts in the water treatment plant source waters were from old calves and adult cattle and might not pose a significant risk to human health.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumDNA, ProtozoanGenotypeHumansMarylandMolecular EpidemiologyMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionRiversSequence Analysis, DNAVirginiaDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID18776033
PMCPMC2576682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.