Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18775876›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2009

Variation in nicotine consumption in inbred mice is not linked to orosensory ability.

A Rebecca Glatt, Kelley Denton, John D Boughter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sensory Effects of Nicotine and Tobacco.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Oral Nicotine Self-Administration in Rodents.Journal of addiction research & therapy · 2012
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Rebecca GlattDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Kelley Denton
John D Boughter
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Genetic Dissection of a Motor Central Pattern GeneratorR21NS052366 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI BOUGHTER, JOHN D · 2007 to 2008
$319k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC000353NINDS NIH HHS NS052366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic studies of nicotine addiction in mice have utilized the oral self-administration model. However, it is unclear if strain differences in nicotine consumption are influenced by variation in bitter taste sensitivity. We measured both nicotine consumption and nicotine brief-access licking behavior in several commonly used inbred strains of mice that were previously shown to differ in nicotine consumption. A/J (A), C57BL/6J (B6), and DBA/2J (D2) mice were given a 2-bottle choice test with a single concentration of nicotine (75 microg/ml; nicotine vs. water). Mice of these strains were also tested with a range of nicotine concentrations (5-400 microg/ml) using a brief-access test, which measures orosensory response and minimizes postingestive effects. Although B6 mice consumed more 75-microg/ml nicotine than A or D2 mice in the 2-bottle test, these strains did not differ in level of aversion to nicotine when tested with the brief-access procedure. Strain differences in orosensory response to nicotine were not found; yet, differences emerged during the 2-bottle tests. This study provides evidence that variation in intake level of nicotine is likely not due to differences in taste or trigeminal sensitivity but likely due to postingestive factors.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantGenetic VariationAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBANicotinePsychomotor PerformanceSpecies SpecificityStimulation, ChemicalTasteNicotine

Identifiers

PMID18775876
PMCPMC2639451
OpenAlexW2167757180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.