Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18774913›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2008

Antiangiogenic blockage: a new treatment for glioblastoma.

Marc C Chamberlain

Abstract readCommentEditorialReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. MRI-based characterization of vascular disruption by 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-acetic acid in gliomas.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc C Chamberlain
Weatherford College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiogenesis is common in cancer and reflects the requirement for a vascular network to support continued uncontrolled growth. Two strategies of antiangiogenic therapy have emerged; one targeting VEGF (growth-factor-ligand-based antagonists) and the second targeting VEGF receptor (receptor-based antagonists, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors).

methodsThe literature as reviewed by Reardon et al. [1] regarding treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG) with antiangiogenic therapy (predominantly ligand-based and administered in conjunction with cytotoxic chemotherapy) reports response rates of 30 - 60% and 6-month progression-free survival of 25 - 50%. Problems include new antiangiogenic-class side effects and control of administration and timing in relation to surgery. RESULTS/

conclusionsLigand-based antiangiogenic therapy is a compelling targeted therapy for HGG and will continue to emerge as an important antiglioma therapy. Further studies are required to define the population of patients in whom this therapy is of benefit, identify the optimal dose and schedule, characterize the value of co-administered (cytotoxic and targeted) therapies and establish validated response measures.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalGlioblastomaHumansVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID18774913
OpenAlexW2162868519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.