ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2008
Antiangiogenic blockage: a new treatment for glioblastoma.
Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- VEGF promotes proliferation of human glioblastoma multiforme stem-like cells through VEGF receptor 2.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013Article
- Inhibition of Nodal suppresses angiogenesis and growth of human gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2011Article
- MRI-based characterization of vascular disruption by 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-acetic acid in gliomas.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAngiogenesis is common in cancer and reflects the requirement for a vascular network to support continued uncontrolled growth. Two strategies of antiangiogenic therapy have emerged; one targeting VEGF (growth-factor-ligand-based antagonists) and the second targeting VEGF receptor (receptor-based antagonists, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors).
methodsThe literature as reviewed by Reardon et al. [1] regarding treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG) with antiangiogenic therapy (predominantly ligand-based and administered in conjunction with cytotoxic chemotherapy) reports response rates of 30 - 60% and 6-month progression-free survival of 25 - 50%. Problems include new antiangiogenic-class side effects and control of administration and timing in relation to surgery. RESULTS/
conclusionsLigand-based antiangiogenic therapy is a compelling targeted therapy for HGG and will continue to emerge as an important antiglioma therapy. Further studies are required to define the population of patients in whom this therapy is of benefit, identify the optimal dose and schedule, characterize the value of co-administered (cytotoxic and targeted) therapies and establish validated response measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.