Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18769895›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2008

Recent advances in management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Manasi Shah, Bharat Agarwal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manasi ShahBridgeport Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale, USA. mansi1227@gmail.com
Bharat Agarwal
Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children · INYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common childhood malignancy. AML has therapeutically been difficult to treat. In 2001, the World Health Organization (WHO), in conjunction with the Society for Hematopathology and the European Association of Hematopathology, published a new classification for myeloid neoplasms. A number of chromosomal abnormalities are used to predict outcome and stratify therapeutic risk groups in children with AML. Recently, alterations in receptor tyrosine kinases, tyrosine phosphatases and in oncogenes such as RAS have been implicated in the pathogenesis of AML. This article aims to review the recent development in diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of AML. Better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of AML has led to the development of target-specific therapies. Some of the new classes of drugs include monoclonal antibody directed against the CD33 antigen, farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTI), and FMSlike tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors. The role of allogenic SCT, particularly whether it should be done during first CR or reserved for second remission, remains the most controversial issue in pediatric AML. There is a need of collaboration with international pediatric cooperative oncology groups and definitive clinical trials in order to establish use of these newer molecules in pediatric populations.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticAntineoplastic AgentsChildChild, Preschoolfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3HumansImmunologic FactorsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisRemission InductionSialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 3Antibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticAntineoplastic AgentsCD33 protein, humanfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3Immunologic FactorsSialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 3

Identifiers

PMID18769895
OpenAlexW2048751905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.