ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
Demographics, sexual risk behaviours and uptake of screening for sexually transmitted infections among attendees of a weekly women-only community clinic program.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outreach for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.BMC public health · 2013Pooled it
- Preliminary development of a scale to measure stigma relating to sexually transmitted infections among women in a high risk neighbourhood.BMC women's health · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesVancouver's DTES represents a high-risk neighbourhood, in which there exist a number of community clinics and outreach programs. The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to describe the population of women attending a weekly women's program with respect to demographics, risk behaviours and prevalence of STI, and 2) to assess the uptake of STI screening in this setting.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was undertaken during a weekly community clinic-based women's program from October to December, 2004. Women were recruited at the start of the program each week and were invited to provide urine samples for chlamydia and gonorrhea screening.
resultsAmong 126 respondents, the median age was 42 (36-49), more than half (52%) self-identified as White and 40% as Aboriginal ethnicity. Forty percent were currently involved in the sex trade. Two thirds reported a Pap smear in the past year, while 14% had not accessed sexual health care (Pap smear, STI or HIV testing). Among the 92/126 (74%) women providing a urine sample, the prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea was 2.2% and 0.0%, respectively.
conclusionThe majority of women accessing this program were over 35 years of age, and while nearly half were currently involved in the sex trade, cross-sectional screening did not reveal a substantial prevalence of STIs. Women who were not regular program attendees reported less sexual health care, and represented the only two cases of chlamydia found. Innovative programs that better serve the needs of populations that remain unable or unwilling to seek sexual health care in its current formats are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18767266PMC6976145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.