Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18766420›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2009

Small intestinal submucosa as a bioscaffold for tissue regeneration in defects of the colonic wall.

Jens Hoeppner, Vladan Crnogorac, Goran Marjanovic, Eva Jüttner, Wojciech Karcz, Hans-Fred Weiser, Ullrich Theodor Hopt

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds for Building Gastrointestinal Tissue.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Anastomotic sealing by extracellular matrices (ECM) improves healing of colonic anastomoses in the critical early phase.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010
    Article
  7. Naturally-Derived Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications.Advances in experimental medicine and biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jens HoeppnerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. jens.hoeppner@uniklinik-freiburg.de
Vladan Crnogorac
Goran Marjanovic
Eva Jüttner
Wojciech Karcz
Hans-Fred Weiser
Ullrich Theodor Hopt
University of Freiburg · DEAgaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall intestinal submucosa (SIS) has proved considerable regenerative capacity for repair of bowel wall defects at different locations. This study assesses the effectiveness of SIS in the repair of defects at a gastrointestinal location with strong bacterial contamination.

methodsFourteen domestic pigs had a 4.5 x 1.5 cm full-thickness defect created on the wall of the descending colon. Repair was done by suturing an SIS patch to the defect. Grafts were harvested after 30, 60, and 90 days. Outcomes were evaluated on the basis of animal survival, clinical course, and macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical assessment.

resultsAll animals survived the scheduled observation period. No patch failure and no postoperative leakage occurred. No luminal narrowing occurred at SIS-patched colon. Morphometric examination revealed contraction of the patched area of 77% after 30 days and more than 90% after 60 and 90 days. By 60 and 90 days, all animals showed mucosal regeneration at the margins of the graft. By 90 days, regeneration of smooth muscle cells was present at the original site of the muscularis mucosae. None of the reconstructed areas showed complete mucosal coverage or regeneration of a structured muscular layer.

conclusionSIS can be used effectively for patch repair of colonic defects in a porcine model. Distinctive contraction of the reconstructed area and limited architectural regeneration of the bowel wall suggest limitation of morphologic regenerative capacities in large-bowel regeneration.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsColonDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGuided Tissue RegenerationIntestinal MucosaSwineTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18766420
OpenAlexW2090764213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.