Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18765957›Full record

Trial reportPancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]2008

Multicenter approach to recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis in the United States: the North American Pancreatitis Study 2 (NAPS2).

David C Whitcomb, Dhiraj Yadav, Slivka Adam, Robert H Hawes, Randall E Brand, Michelle A Anderson, Mary E Money, Peter A Banks, Michele D Bishop, John Baillie and 18 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 243 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Opioids for acute pancreatitis pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Clinical and CT Imaging Features of Chronic Pancreatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study From Vietnam.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Idiopathic chronic pancreatitis: clinical highlights.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Acute pancreatitis precedes chronic pancreatitis in the majority of patients: Results from the NAPS2 consortium.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 18 institutions in 3 countries.

David C WhitcombDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. whitcomb@pitt.edu
Dhiraj Yadav
Slivka Adam
Robert H Hawes
Randall E Brand
Michelle A Anderson
Mary E Money
Peter A Banks
Michele D Bishop
John Baillie
Stuart Sherman
James DiSario
Frank R Burton
Timothy B Gardner
Stephen T Amann
Andres Gelrud
Simon K Lo
Mark T DeMeo
William M Steinberg
Michael L Kochman
Babak Etemad
Christopher E Forsmark
Beth Elinoff
Julia B Greer
Michael O'Connell
Janette Lamb
M Michael Barmada
North American Pancreatic Study Group
University of Pittsburgh · USDartmouth Hospital · GBHarvard University Press · USJacksonville College · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · USNorth Mississippi Medical Center · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USOchsner Medical Center · USRush University · USUCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels · BEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Utah · USWashington Hospital · US

Funding

North American Pancreatitis Study 2 (NAPS2)R01DK061451 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WHITCOMB, DAVID CLEMENT · 2002 to 2010
$4.9M
NAPS2 Continuation Genome Wide Association Study of PancreatitisR56DK061451 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WHITCOMB, DAVID CLEMENT · 2011 to 2011
$1.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK061451NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK061451NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK061451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) are complex syndromes associated with numerous etiologies, clinical variables and complications. We developed the North American Pancreatitis Study 2 (NAPS2) to be sufficiently powered to understand the complex environmental, metabolic and genetic mechanisms underlying RAP and CP.

methodsBetween August 2000 and September 2006, a consortium of 20 expert academic and private sites prospectively ascertained 1,000 human subjects with RAP or CP, plus 695 controls (spouse, family, friend or unrelated). Standardized questionnaires were completed by both the physicians and study subjects and blood was drawn for genomic DNA and biomarker studies. All data were double-entered into a database and systematically reviewed to minimize errors and include missing data.

resultsA total of 1,000 subjects (460 RAP, 540 CP) and 695 controls who completed consent forms and questionnaires and donated blood samples comprised the final dataset. Data were organized according to diagnosis, supporting documentation, etiological classification, clinical signs and symptoms (including pain patterns and duration, and quality of life), past medical history, family history, environmental exposures (including alcohol and tobacco use), medication use and therapeutic interventions. Upon achieving the target enrollment, data were organized and classified to facilitate future analysis. The approaches, rationale and datasets are described, along with final demographic results.

conclusionThe NAPS2 consortium has successfully completed a prospective ascertainment of 1,000 subjects with RAP and CP from the USA. These data will be useful in elucidating the environmental, metabolic and genetic conditions, and to investigate the complex interactions that underlie RAP and CP.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMalePancreatitis, ChronicRecurrenceRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18765957
PMCPMC2790781
OpenAlexW1999840642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.